Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (1): 27-30    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.01.007
  临床论著 |
胸腔镜食管癌根治术的临床效果及术后并发症观察
李晓雷, 徐俊, 梁青松, 陈旭
四川省南充市中心医院胸外科,南充 637000
Observation of Clinical Effect and Postoperative Complications of Videoassisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma
LI Xiaolei, XU Jun, LIANG Qingsong, CHEN Xu
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (188KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的观察胸腔镜食管癌根治术的临床效果及术后并发症情况。方法选取2014年8月至2016年9月我院收治的92例食管癌患者,根据手术方式将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组46例, 其中观察组行胸腔镜食管癌根治术, 对照组行开放食管癌根治术。比较两组患者手术情况、 肺功能的改变及术后并发症情况。结果比较两组患者的手术情况,观察组患者的手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术中出血量、术后引流量、拔管时间及患者术后下床活动时间明显优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者淋巴结清扫数量无明显差异(P>0.05)。观察组患者术后VC%、FEV1%明显优于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术后FEV%、FVC%、MVV%比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。观察组术后共发生7例并发症,占15.22%,对照组患者术后共发生20例并发症,占43.48%;观察组术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与传统开胸手术相比,胸腔镜食管癌根治术具有创伤小、康复时间短等优点,并且可降低术后并发症发生率,具有重要的临床意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
LI Xiaolei
XU Jun
LIANG Qingsong
CHEN Xu
关键词:  胸腔镜检查  食管肿瘤    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect and postoperative complications in patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery.MethodsFrom August 2014 to September 2016, 92 cases of esophageal carcinoma were treated in our hospital. The patients were divided into the observation group and the control group, with 46 patients in each group. The observation group was treated with videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery. And the control group was treated with open esophagectomy. The operation indexes, pulmonary function and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsOperation time of the observation group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P<0.05); The amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, extubation time and postoperative ambulation time of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of dissected lymph nodes (P>0.05). The VC% and FEV1% of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in FEV%, FVC% and MVV% between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative complication rate of the observation group and the control group was 15.22% (7/46) and 43.48% (20/46) respectively; which showed obvious superiority of the observation group (P<0.05).ConclusionComparing with traditional open chest surgery, it is recommended of the thoracoscopic radical resection for esophageal carcinoma patients for the advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery and less postoperative complication rate.
Key words:  thoracoscopy    esophageal neoplasms
               出版日期:  2017-02-26      发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-02-26
ZTFLH:  R735.1  
通讯作者:  徐俊,男,35岁,四川省南充市中心医院胸外科主治医师。   
作者简介:  李晓雷,男,46岁,四川省南充市中心医院胸外科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
李晓雷, 徐俊, 梁青松, 陈旭. 胸腔镜食管癌根治术的临床效果及术后并发症观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 27-30.
LI Xiaolei, XU Jun, LIANG Qingsong, CHEN Xu. Observation of Clinical Effect and Postoperative Complications of Videoassisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(1): 27-30.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.01.007  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I1/27
Essadi I, Lalya I, Mansouri H. Esophageal carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015,372(15):14701471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1500692#SA1.
[2] 乔友林. 食管癌流行病学研究的重要里程碑[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43(12):500501.
[3] 金虎日, 车成日. 电视胸腹腔镜下与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的疗效对比分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2014,43(14):17271728.
[4] Hoffmann AC, Vallbhmer D, Grimminger P, et al. Preoperative survivin mRNA detection in peripheral blood is an independent predictor ofoutcome in esophageal carcinoma[J]. Pharmacogenomics, 2010,11(3):341347. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.164.
[5] Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophagealcancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014,20(18):55405547. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540.
[6] 左婷婷, 郑荣寿, 曾红梅,等. 中国食管癌发病状况与趋势分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2016, 38(9):703708.
[7] Napier KJ, Scheerer M, Misra S. Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatmentmodalities[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014,6(5):112120. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.112.
[8] Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, et al. Esophageal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2010[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2014,5(4):343348. doi: 10.1111/17597714.12100.
[9] 凌建华. 胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗早期食管癌的临床疗效观察[J]. 四川医学, 2014(5):569571.
[10] 王晓骏, 张铸, 孙清超. 胸腹腔镜联合下食管癌切除术与开放手术疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 世界华人消化杂志,2014, 22(3): 375382.
[11] Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrández Arenas , Lanas Arbeloa . Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in Western and Easterncountries[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015,21(26):79337943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7933.
[12] Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of open threefield and minimallyinvasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011,12(3):366369. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.258632.
[13] Ye K, Xu JH, Sun YF, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of lymph node metastases near the recurrent laryngealnerve from thoracic esophageal carcinoma[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2014,13(3):64116419. doi: 10.4238/2014.August.25.4.
[1] 李辉, 胡波, 徐文忠, 刘洋, 凌宝存, 孔令媛. 全食管切除术中升主动脉破裂出血1例报告[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 0-0000.
[2] 陈伟妍,李桂艳,辛春,付勇强,付春子. 食管癌组织中MTA1、SOX2的表达及与预后的关系研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 251-256.
[3] 吴毓优,董吴平,王军,高炳玉,刘苏. 胸腔镜辅助小切口手术治疗结核性脓胸的效果研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 305-308.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed