Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery 2018, Vol. 22 Issue (1): 52-55 DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.01.014 |
Clinical Research |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect Comparison on Transurethral Enucleation of Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate forBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia |
HE Bin1,NI Hao-dong1,TANG Qing-sheng1,XI Peng-shan1,ZHOU Xun-rong1,PAN Zhi-hua1,QU Wei-long2
|
1.Department?of?Urology?Surgery,Dongtai?People's?Hospital,Dongtai?224200,Jiangsu,China; 2.Department?of?Urology?Surgery,The?Second?People's?Hospital?of?Kunshan,Kunshan?215300,Jiangsu,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective?To compare the efficacy of plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation of prostate (TUERP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatichyperplasia.Methods?A total of 120 cases with benign prostatichyperplasia (BPH) from January 2015 to May 2016 weredivided into two groups randomly according to the number random table,with 60 cases for each group.The observation group was performed TUERP and the control group was treated by TURP.The index of intra- and post-operation and long-term effect was compared between two groups.Results?Compare to the control group,the intraoperative blood loss and operation time were lower,and the gland resection volume was more in the observation group,and there was statisticaldifference between two groups (P<0.05).Theduration of bladder irrigation,the time of indwelling catheter and the length ofhospital stays in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and thedifference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The IPSS score and PVR level were lower,but Qmax washigher of the observation than those of the control group 6 months after the operation,and thedifferences were statistically (P<0.05).Conclusion?TUERP would achieve more benefit reliable effect for BPH,and it can improve intra-and postoperative conditions and increase long-term curative effect.
|
Published: 13 August 2018
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HE Bin
|
|
|
|
|
|