Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (5): 376-381    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.013
  临床论著 |
重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱手术治疗前后影像学变化:96例临床分析
乔林1,殷杰1,徐军鹏1,陈波1,张欢1,周玉萍1,王哲2
1.解放军第三医院骨科, 陕西宝鸡 721004; 2.第四军医大学西京医院骨科, 陕西西安 710032
Imaging Changes before and after Surgical Treatment for Severe Isthmic Lumbar Spondylolysis : Clinical Analysis of 96 Cases
QIAO Lin1, YIN Jie1, XU Junpeng1, CHEN Bo1, ZHANG Huan1, ZHOU Yuping1, WANG Zhe2
1.Department of Orthopedics, the Third Hospital of PLA, Baoji 721004, Shaanxi, China; 2. Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (584KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的分析重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱患者手术治疗前后影像学变化及诊断价值。方法 选取2008年5月~2016年10月我院收治的重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱患者96例为研究对象,均行X线、CT、MRI检查,且1周内择期分别行腰椎后路减压术(Y1组)、椎弓根内固定术(Y2组)、椎体间融合术(Y3组), 各32例。分析其手术前后影像学特征, 比较三组治疗有效率, 应用简化McGill疼痛量表、 Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)腰椎评分比较其手术前后疼痛程度、腰椎功能,同时比较所有患者手术前后胸椎后凸角(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、脊柱-骨盆角(SSA)、C7铅垂线与S1后上角的垂直距离(SVA)及骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骨盆入射角(PI),并观察并发症发生情况。结果重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱患者X线、CT及MRI均有特征性表现,腰椎滑脱检出率分别为44.79%, 31.25%及94.79%,术后随访6个月腰椎固定稳定,融合良好;三组治疗总有效率分别为84.37%、87.50%和90.62%,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组术后McGill评分、ODI指数均较治疗前降低, JOA评分均增加(P<0.05), 但组间比较无统计学差异 (P>0.05);术后所有患者X线检查TK、PI与术前比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05),而LL、SSA、SS均较术前显著上升(P<0.05),分别矫正16.01°、20.77°、9.95°,SVA和PT均较术前显著下降(P<0.05),分别矫正5.19 cm和8.49°;三组并发症发生率分别为9.38%、 12.50%和12.50%, 组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱患者外科手术前后除TK、PI影像参数外,LL、SSA、SS均较术前增加,SVA、PT均减少,可作为评估预后的重要指标。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
QIAO Lin1
YIN Jie1
XU Junpeng1
CHEN Bo1
ZHANG Huan1
ZHOU Yuping1
WANG Zhe2
关键词:  脊椎滑脱,峡部裂性  腰椎  影像学检查    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo analyze the imaging changes in the patients with severe isthmic lumbar spondylolysis before and after surgical treatment and the diagnostic value.MethodsA total of 96 patients with severe isthmic lumbar spondylolysis admitted to our hospital during May 2008 to October 2016 were enrolled in the study. All patients were examined by Xray, CT and MRI. According to surgical treatment, 96 cases were divided into Y1, Y2 and Y3 group with 32 cases for each, and performed elective posterior lumbar decompression, pedicle screw internal fixation and interbody fusion respectively. The preand psotoperative imaging features were analyzed, and the treatment efficiency was compared. The pain degree and lumbar function were evaluated with the simplified McGill pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumber assessment scale. The thoracolumbar kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), spinalpelvic angle (SSA), vertical distance from C7 to S1 posterior upper angle (SVA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI) were compared before and after surgery, and the postoperative complications were observed.ResultsThe Xray, CT and MRI exam showed characteristic findings for severe isthmic spondylolysis with detection rate of 44.79%,31.25% and 94.79% respectively. The lumbar fixation was stable and fusion was good in 6 months of followup after surgery. The total effective rates of group Y1, Y2 and Y3 was 84.37%, 87.50% and 90.62% respectively, and there was no statistical difference among them (P>0.05). Postoperative McGill scores and ODI were decreased, but JOA scores were increased in all groups (P<0.05), without statistical differences between groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in TK and PI examined by Xray before and after surgery (P>0.05), while LL, SSA and SS were obviously increased (P<0.05), and the corrected angles were 16.01°, 20.77° and 9.95°, respectively. SVA and PT were significantly decreased, and the corrected value and angle were 5.19 cm and 8.49°respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications in the three groups (9.38% vs.12.50% vs. 12.50%, P>0.05).ConclusionExcept TK and PI, LL, SSA and SS in patients with severe isthmic spondylolysis are significantly increased, while SVA and PT are decreased after surgery, which can play an important role in the evaluation of prognosis.
Key words:  spondylolysis, isthmic    lumbar vertebrae    imaging examination
               出版日期:  2017-10-26      发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-10-26
ZTFLH:  R681.5  
通讯作者:  通讯作者:王哲,男,45岁,第四军医大学西京医院骨科副主任医师,博士。   
作者简介:  乔林,男,38岁,解放军第三医院骨科主治医师。
引用本文:    
乔林1,殷杰1,徐军鹏1,陈波1,张欢1,周玉萍1,王哲2. 重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱手术治疗前后影像学变化:96例临床分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 376-381.
QIAO Lin1, YIN Jie1, XU Junpeng1, CHEN Bo1, ZHANG Huan1, ZHOU Yuping1, WANG Zhe2. Imaging Changes before and after Surgical Treatment for Severe Isthmic Lumbar Spondylolysis : Clinical Analysis of 96 Cases. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(5): 376-381.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.013  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I5/376
[1] 禹志军, 沈合群. 成人腰椎多节段峡部裂性滑脱的手术治疗[J]. 医学临床研究,2009,26(6):983985.
[2] 黄庆华, 陈大勇, 胡凯, 等. 后路单节段椎弓根内固定加环状融合术治疗Ⅰ度、Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱症[J]. 医学临床研究,2010,27(9):16731676.
[3] 李文旭, 姚欣强, 申星, 等. 腰椎峡部裂诊治的研究进展[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2016,16(30):59945997.
[4] 王华东, 尹欣. 脊柱-骨盆矢状位影像学参数与腰椎滑脱关系的研究进展[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志,2016,5(3):231236.
[5] 黄卫国, 海涌. 退行性腰椎滑脱症与峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症患者的手术疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志,2014,3(6):460465.
[6] 翟荣存, 朱胜康, 刘晓东, 等. 峡部裂性与退变性腰椎滑脱的MRI鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2014,12(6):102104.
[7] 米东, 杨明坤, 张旭, 等. 椎弓根螺钉系统内固定联合椎间融合器修复腰椎峡部裂性滑脱症:椎间隙高度恢复的评价[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2014,18(44):71227126.
[8] 弥龙, 李小华, 涂蓉, 等. 腰椎峡部裂的CT重建技术诊断价值及其病因探讨[J]. 海南医学,2016,27(7):11141117.
[9] Viana SL, Viana MA, de Alencar EL. Atypical, unusual, and misleading imaging presentations of spondylolysis[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2015, 44(9):12531262. doi: 10.1007/s0025601521380.
[10] Alqarni AM, Schneiders AG, Cook CE, et al. Clinical tests to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A systematic review[J]. Phys Ther Sport, 2015, 16(3):268275. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.12.005.
[11] 江洁, 董道波, 段维勇, 等. 螺旋CT 重建技术在腰椎峡部裂诊断和治疗中的临床应用价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2014,24(8):13701371,1379.
[12] 何守玉, 朱锋, 孙旭, 等. 成人腰椎峡部裂性滑脱局部稳定性对脊柱骨盆矢状面形态的影响[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(1):7781.
[13] 何守玉, 朱锋, 邱勇, 等. 成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱患者脊柱骨盆矢状面参数变化及其临床意义[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(2):109115.
[14] 张红辰, 王艳芝, 李国新, 等. 滑脱前期腰椎峡部裂的常规X线、CT和MRI检查的诊断价值比较[J]. 河北医药,2014,36(14):21462147.
[15] 刘滔, 王晟昊, 谭成龙, 等. 重度腰椎峡部裂性滑脱后路椎间融合手术治疗的临床及影像学疗效评价[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(21):19331937.
[16] 隋海涛, 李亮, 马晓春, 等. 腰椎峡部裂滑脱患者脊柱骨盆矢状位的平衡[J]. 临床骨科杂志,2015,18(2):136140.
[1] 周建华, 张昊, 陈少初, 张弦, 胡亚威, 菅新民, 卢学有, 罗卓荆, 黄景辉.

一期前后路联合与单纯前路内固定手术治疗腰椎结核的效果对比 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 33-36.

[2] 秦卫,胡丹,司卫兵,焦健. 经伤椎置钉手术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 387-390.
[3] 王欣文,刘继军,王文涛,吴起宁,郝定均,屈巍. 3D打印技术在经皮椎体成形术中的临床应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 321-326.
[4] 岑毕文,王达义,尚晖,吴亚鹏,杨棋. Ponte截骨联合骨水泥强化治疗胸腰段陈旧性骨质疏松骨折并后凸畸形[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 125-130.
[5] 石裕明,王炜昌,杨庆,王荣生. 椎体裂隙征对经皮椎体后凸成形术疗效的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 131-135.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed