Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (6): 423-427    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.007
  临床论著 |
经后外单侧入路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床疗效观察
雷剑飞1,雷黎力1,覃卫常1,陈焕诗2,任忠亮3
1. 广西融安县人民医院脊柱关节外科, 广西柳州 545400; 2.柳州市柳铁中心医院骨科,广西柳州 545007; 3. 陕西榆林市第二医院烧伤整形手足外科, 陕西榆林 719000
Clinical Observation of the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Posterior Unilateral Approach
LEI Jian-fei1,LEI Li-li1,QIN Wei-chang1,CHEN Huan-shi2,REN Zhong-liang3
1.Department of Spinal Surgery,Rong'an People's Hospital of Guangxi,Liuzhou545400,Guangxi,China; 2.Department of Orthopedics,Liuzhou Municipal Liutie Central Hospital,Liuzhou545007,Guangxi,China; 3.Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery,the Second Hospital of Yulin,Yulin719000,Shaanxi,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (214KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨经后外单侧入路椎体次全切、植骨融合、钉棒固定术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床疗效。方法选取我院自2014年1月至2016年3月收治41例Denis B型胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者,按照采取的手术方式不同分为后外单侧入路组(23例)和侧前方入路组(18例),后外单侧入路组采用经后外单侧入路椎体次全切植骨融合钉棒固定术,侧前方入路组采用侧前方入路椎体次全切植骨融合钉板固定。并比较两组患者手术指标、术后神经功能恢复情况、胸腰椎后凸角(Cobb角)恢复情况、植骨融合情况,采用日本矫形外科协会(JOA)制定的下腰痛疾患评分法进行临床疗效评价。结果①两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);②Cobb角恢复情况:两组患者术后1周Cobb角与术前比较改善明显,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1年后外单侧入路组Cobb角改善情况明显优于侧前方入路组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05); ③神经功能恢复情况: 术后1年两组患者ASIA分级明显优于术前, 差异具有统计学意义 (P<0.05); 组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);④疗效评价:后外单侧入路组临床总有效率为95.65%,侧前方入路组临床总有效率为72.22%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折中,经后外单侧入路椎体次全切植骨融合钉棒固定与侧前方入路椎体次全切植骨融合钉板固定相比疗效显著,术后胸腰椎后凸角改善良好,值得临床推广。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
雷剑飞1,雷黎力1,覃卫常1,陈焕诗2,任忠亮3
关键词:  脊柱骨折  后外单侧入路  侧前方入路    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effects of posterior unilateral approach in subtotal vertebrectomy, bone graft fusion and pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.MethodsFrom January 2014 to March 2016, 41 cases of Denis B thoracolumbar burst fractures were selected. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups. The posterior unilateral approach group (group A, n=23) was treated by the posterior unilateral approach, subtotal vertebrectomy, bone graft fusion and pedicle screw fixation. The lateral anterior approach group (group B, n=18) was treated with the lateral anterior approach. The clinical results of the two groups were compared retrospectively.Results①There was no significant difference in operative time, the amount of bleeding and postoperative drainage between the two groups (P>0.05). ② Both the two groups after 1 week got the Cobb angle improved significantly comparing with preoperative one (P<0.05), and the 1- year postoperative Cobb angle of group A was lower than that of group B (P<0.05). ③In both groups, the postoperative ASIA grading was better than before (P<0.05); But there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). ④The clinical total effective rate was 95.65% of group A, which was significantly better than 72.22% of group B (P<0.05).ConclusionIn the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, it is proved to be efficacy of the posterior unilateral approach in the treatment of vertebral subtotal resection, bone fusion and pedicle screw fixation, with better postoperative Cobb angle improvement. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
Key words:  spinal fractures    posterior lateral approach    lateral anterior approach
                    发布日期:  2018-05-28      期的出版日期:  2017-12-26
ZTFLH:  R683.1  
通讯作者:  任忠亮   
作者简介:  雷剑飞,男,41岁,广西融安县人民医院脊柱关节外科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
雷剑飞1,雷黎力1,覃卫常1,陈焕诗2,任忠亮3. 经后外单侧入路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 423-427.
LEI Jian-fei. Clinical Observation of the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Posterior Unilateral Approach. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(6): 423-427.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.007  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I6/423
[1] 周田华, 苏踊跃, 李川, 等. 经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术在胸腰段爆裂性骨折手术中的应用[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(7):584-587.[2] Freude T, K?nig B, Martetschl?ger F, et al. Safe surgical technique: cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation and balloon-guided kyphoplasty for a lumbar burst fracture in a 97-year-old patient[J]. Patient Saf Surg, 2013,7(1):3.[3] Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1983,8(8):817-831.[4] 华永均, 王人彦, 郭志辉, 等. 后外单侧入路椎体次全切融合钉棒固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J]. 中国骨伤,2016,29(1):27-32.[5] 沈皆亮, 郝 杰, 胡侦明, 等. 后路椎体次全切钛网植入内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2015,17(5):430-433.[6] 蒙德, 杨睿. 胸腰椎爆裂性骨折手术治疗的研究进展[J]. 岭南现代临床外科,2016,16(6):751-754.[7] Ditunno JF Jr, Young W, Donovan WH, et al. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cordinjury. American Spinal Injury Association[J]. Paraplegia, 1994 ,32(2):70-80.[8] Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauchi Y, et al. Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996,21(2):242-248.[9] Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, et al. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures[J]. Spine J, 2014 ,14(1):145-164.[10] Scheer JK, Bakhsheshian J, Fakurnejad S, et al. Evidence-based medicine of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of operative management across 20 years[J]. Global Spine J, 2015,5(1):73-82.[11] Zhu Q, Shi F, Cai W, et al. Comparison of anterior versus posterior approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review[J]. Int Surg, 2015,100(6):1124-1133.[12] Mc Anany SJ, Overley SC, Kim JS, et al. Open versus minimally invasive fixation techniques for thoracolumbar trauma: a meta-analysis[J]. Global Spine J, 2016,6(2):186-194.[13] Kumar A, Aujla R, Lee C. The management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study between conservativemanagement, traditional open spinal surgery and minimally interventional spinal surgery[J]. Springerplus, 2015,4:204.[14] Liu Y, Li G, Dong T, et al. One-stage partial vertebrectomy, titanium mesh implantation and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures through a posterior approach[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2014,69(12):804-808.[15] 刘桂勇, 胡永军, 范远俊, 等. 椎体内植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2015,37(6):584-587.
[1] 王干生,陈峰,倪生华,秦红明. 经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者40例疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 419-422.
[2] 秦卫,胡丹,司卫兵,焦健. 经伤椎置钉手术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 387-390.
[3] 崔志刚,张德光,刘福全. 经皮穿刺椎体成形术结合体位复位在老年胸腰椎压缩性骨折中的应用效果[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 382-386.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed