Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (3): 161-164    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.001
  临床论著 |
吸引器解剖胆囊三角在急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用
曾新桃,罗华,张伟,杨培
四川省绵阳市中心医院肝胆外科,陈孝平院士工作站, 绵阳 621000
Dissection of Calot's Triangle by Suction Apparatus in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
ZENG Xintao, LUO Hua, ZHANG Wei, YANG Pei
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, CHEN Xiaoping Academician Workstation, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (189KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用普通吸引器钝性解剖胆囊三角的安全性及可行性。方法2013年1月~2017年1月我院采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎患者408例,根据胆囊三角解剖使用器械的不同分为超声刀解剖组(UK组,n=200)及吸引器钝性解剖组(SA组,n=208)。比较分析两组患者临床资料。结果两组出血量、中转开腹率、腹腔引流率以及术后住院时间、腹腔引流时间、胆总管继发结石及腹腔残余感染发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但UK组胆囊三角解剖时间长于SA组,胆管损伤率高于SA组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组均无不可控制的大出血,无气体栓塞、穿刺副损伤发生,中转开腹的3例患者均为胆囊三角区解剖困难。UK组及SA组分别有10例(5.00%)及2例(0.96%)患者出现胆汁漏(均为A级),组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05 )。两组患者术后均无严重并发症发生,无死亡病例,无非计划再次手术病例。所有病人均门诊随访,平均随访时间(28.74±11.59)个月,未见胆道狭窄,无腹痛、发热、黄疸等临床症状。结论急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,术中采用吸引器解剖胆囊三角,不增加出血量,有利于缩短胆囊三角解剖时间,降低胆管损伤及胆汁漏发生率,安全可靠,值得临床推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
ZENG Xintao
LUO Hua
ZHANG Wei
YANG Pei
关键词:  胆囊切除术,腹腔镜  吸引器  胆囊炎,急性    
Abstract: Objective To discuss the safety and feasibility of using aspirator to dissect passively the Calot's triangle in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute calculous cholecystitis. Methods A total of 408 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis underwent LC from January 2013 to January 2017 were divided into ultrasound knife dissection group (UK group, n=200) and the blunt suction apparatus dissection group (SA group, n=208) according to the dissection technique of Calot's triangle anatomy of the gallbladder. The clinical curative effects were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in bleeding loss, conversion rate to open surgery, abdominal drainage rate, the postoperative hospital stays, the abdominal drainage duration, the rate of secondary stones of the common bile duct and the residual infection rate of the abdominal cavity between the two groups (P>0.05). Compare to the SA group, the dissection time of gallbladder triangle was longer and the injury rate of bile duct was higher in UK group(P<0.05), and the differences were statistically (P<0.05). No uncontrollable hemorrhea, gas embolism and puncture injuries were found in all cases. There was bile leakage in 10 cases (5.00%) and 2 cases (0.96%) in UK group and SA group respectively, and the difference was statistically (P<0.05). No serious complications, deaths and unplanned reoperation occurred in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average period of (28.74±11.59) months. No biliary strictures, abdominal pain, fever and jaundice was found.ConclusionsThe dissection of Calot's triangle by suction apparatus is safe and reliable, and it does not increase the amount of bleeding, and is beneficial to shorten the operation time of dissection of Calot's triangle and reduce the incidence of bile duct injury and biliary leakage in LC for acute calculous cholecystitis. It is worthy of clinical application.
Key words:  cholecystectomy, laparoscopic    suction apparatus    cholecystitis, acute
               出版日期:  2018-06-26      发布日期:  2018-09-05      期的出版日期:  2018-06-26
ZTFLH:  R657.4  
基金资助: 四川省卫生计生委普及应用项目(项目编号:17PJ146)
通讯作者:  杨培, 男, 45岁,四川省绵阳市中心医院肝胆外科主任医师,医学博士。   
作者简介:  曾新桃, 男, 39 岁, 四川省绵阳市中心医院肝胆外科副主任医师,医学硕士。
引用本文:    
曾新桃,罗华,张伟,杨培. 吸引器解剖胆囊三角在急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(3): 161-164.
ZENG Xintao, LUO Hua, ZHANG Wei, YANG Pei. Dissection of Calot's Triangle by Suction Apparatus in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(3): 161-164.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.001  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I3/161
[1] Attili AF, Carulli N, Roda E, et al. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.)[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 1995, 141(2):158165.
[2] Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2005, 7(2):132140.
[3] 陈训如. 急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术处理[J]. 肝胆外科杂志,1998,6(2) :67.
[4] 罗华, 黎前德, 王宁, 等. 电视LC3000例体会[J]. 四川医学,2011,22(1):4243.
[5] Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(5):680688. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002.
[6] Sartelli M, AbuZidan FM, Catena F, et al. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intraabdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study)[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2015, 10:61. doi: 10.1186/s1301701500550. eCollection 2015.
[7] 侯湘德, 白剑, 谢开汉, 等. LC治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病59例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(4):377379.
[8] 焦建国. 手术时机选择对腹腔镜下胆囊切除治疗急性结石性胆囊炎疗效的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志,2016,2(5):285288.
[9] 吴颜军, 张丽娥, 杨希恩. 急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术时机的选择及其对生活质量的影响[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(12):15161518.
[10] 白永福, 王瑞平, 李生贵. LC治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的手术时机和并发症预防[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志,2015,19(2):103106.
[11] 张成武, 赵大建, 邹寿椿, 等. 急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术时机及中转开腹影响因素的探讨[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12,(12):821824.
[12] Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, (2):CD011549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011549.
[13] Choi IY, Yeom SK, Cha SH, et al. Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with GdEOBDTPA versus T2weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography[J]. Clin Imaging, 2014, 38(2):164169. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001.
[1] 朱建平1,牟东成1,薛晨辉2,余国华3,杨广伟1,李永猛1,马双飞1,张奇峰1,赵勇1,赵磊1,王海涛1,孙伟光1,谭建平1. 急性胆囊炎胆囊颈管结石嵌顿的腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 10-13.
[2] 牟泳霖,张筠,曹军英,里子彧,于馨,高越. PTGD治疗老年急性胆囊炎105例[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 416-418.
[3] 周后平,宋新,姚本能,周旅. 腹腔镜下复杂胆囊切除术119例临床分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 337-339.
[4] 刘昌军1,2,3,黄飞舟2,3,尹新民1,2,毛先海1,2,蒋波1,2,周海兰1,2,吴金术1,2. 腹腔镜胆管损伤157例处理及近期随访分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 90-93.
[1] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 168 -173 .
[2] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 174 -177 .
[3] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 178 -181 .
[4] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 182 -186 .
[5] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 187 -190 .
[6] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 191 -193 .
[7] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 194 -196 .
[8] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 197 -200 .
[9] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 201 -205 .
[10] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 206 -210 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed