Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (2): 131-135    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.013
  临床论著 |
椎体裂隙征对经皮椎体后凸成形术疗效的影响
石裕明,王炜昌,杨庆,王荣生
广东省信宜市人民医院骨科,茂名525300
The Effect of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures with Vertebral Body Splitting Sign
SHI Yu-ming,WANG Wei-chang,YANG Qing,WANG Rong-sheng
Department of Orthopaedics,Xinyi People's Hospital,Xinyi 525300,Guangdong,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (536KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨椎体裂隙征对经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效影响。方法回顾分析我院2014年5月~2016年5月行PVP术治疗的骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者96例,根据患者是否合并椎体裂隙征分为裂隙组32例和无裂隙组64例。比较两组患者的临床疗效、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、伤椎前缘相对高度、伤椎矢状面Cobb角以及术中骨水泥注入量、分布形态和渗漏情况。结果治疗1月后,无裂隙组和裂隙组临床有效率分别为98.4%和90.6%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术后VAS、ODI评分明显下降,Cobb角及伤椎前缘相对高度明显改善,与术前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05);但组间VAS、ODI、Cobb角及伤椎前缘相对高度比较,差异均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。无裂隙组患者术中骨水泥注入量明显少于裂隙组(P<0.05);术中骨水泥弥散不佳仅1例,明显少于裂隙组5例(P<0.05);术中骨水泥渗漏仅2例,明显少于裂隙组6例(P<0.05)。结论PVP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折时,无论伤椎内是否存在裂隙,均能取得满意的临床疗效。而椎体裂隙征的存在会增加骨水泥注入量,出现骨水泥弥散不佳及骨水泥渗漏发生率较高等问题。因此,术中应尽量使骨水泥填满裂隙,结合抗骨质疏松治疗,同时避免骨水泥椎管内渗漏,预防畸形矫正丢失及术后再骨折的出现。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
石裕明,王炜昌,杨庆,王荣生
关键词:  胸腰椎骨折  椎体裂隙征  经皮椎体后凸成形术  骨质疏松    
Abstract: Objective To study the effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty(PVP)in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF)with vertebral splitting sign.MethodsA total of 96 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures underwent PVP were analyzed retrospectively from May 2014 to May 2016.All cases were divided into vertebral splitting group(n=32)and non-splitting group(n=64)according to OVCF with concomitant vertebral splitting or not.The clinical efficacy,pain visual analog scale,Oswestry dysfunction index,the relative height of the anterior vertebrae of the enrolled vertebrae,the angle of the Cobb of the injured vertebrae,the amount of bone cement injected,the distribution of the cement and the leakage rate of cement were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe effective rate was 96.2% and 90.6% respectively in the vertebral splitting group and non-splitting group 1 month after the PVP,and there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P >0.05).The VAS and ODI were decreased,and the Cobb angle and the relative height of anterior injured vertebrae were improved after the operation than those before operation in both groups(P <0.05).However,there was no statistical difference in post-operative VAS,ODI,Cobb angle and relative height of anterior injured vertebrae between the two groups(P >0.05).The injected amount of bone cement was lower i n non-splittinggroup than that in splitting group(P <0.05).The poordistribution and the leakage of cement were found in 1 and 2 cases respectively in non-splitting group,and found in 5 and 6 cases respectively in splitting group,there were statistical differences between two groups in them(P <0.05).ConclusionsPVP can achieve satisfactory clinical results in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures with or without vertebral splitting.However,the amount of bone cement infusion may increase,and the poor bone cement diffusion and high incidence of bone cement leakage would appeared in the patients with vertebral splitting,so the managements were performed necessarily with stuffing the vertebral splitting during the operation,avoiding cement spinal leakage,deformity correction lost and re-fracture,and anti-osteoporosis treatment after the operation.
Key words:  thoracolumbar fracture    vertebral splitting sign    percutaneous kyphoplasty    osteoporosis
收稿日期:  2016-10-26      修回日期:  2017-04-17                发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-04-26
ZTFLH:  R683.2  
通讯作者:  石裕明   
作者简介:  石裕明,男,43岁,广东省信宜市人民医院骨科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
石裕明,王炜昌,杨庆,王荣生. 椎体裂隙征对经皮椎体后凸成形术疗效的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 131-135.
SHI Yu-ming. The Effect of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures with Vertebral Body Splitting Sign. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(2): 131-135.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.013  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I2/131
[1]Zhang HT,Chen GD,Yang HL,et al.Percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoblastic-related spinal metastases[J].Clin Spine Surg,2017,30(2):80-84. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a35745.[2]Lin D,Hao J,Li L,et al.Effect of bone cement volume fraction on adjacent vertebral fractures after unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty[J].Clin Spine Surg,2017,30(3):E270-E275.doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000204.[3]Chang W,Zhang X,Jiao N,et al.Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:A meta-analysis[J].Medicine,2017,96(17):e6738.doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000006738.[4]胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印钦,等.实用骨科学[M].第3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2008.723-740.[5]Fairbank J.Use of oswestry disability index(ODI)[J].Spine,1995,20(13):1535-1537.[6]Apan A,Cuva?Apan,Kse EA.Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty:comparison withgeneral anesthesia[J].Turk J Med Sci,2016,46(6):1801-1807.doi:10.3906/sag-1507-90.[7]Boji BM,Ho J.Poster 98 cerebral infarction secondary to cement embolism through a patent foramen ovale after percutaneous kyphoplasty:A case report[J].PM R,2016,8(9S):S193.doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.07.141.[8]Cheng X,Long HQ,Xu JH,et al.Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture(OVCF):a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur Spine J,2016,25(11):3439-3449.[9]He X,Li H,Meng Y,et al.Percutaneous kyphoplasty evaluated by cement volume and distribution:an analysis of clinical data[J].Pain Physician,2016,19(7):495-506.[10]Yang H,Liu H,Wang S,et al.Review of percutaneous kyphoplasty in china[J].Spine,2016,41 Suppl 19:B52-B58.[11]Yang S,Liu Y,Yang H,et al.Risk factors and correlation of secondary adjacent vertebral compression fracture in percutaneous kyphoplasty[J].Int J Surg,2016,36(Pt A):138-142.doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.030.[12]Kan SL,Yuan ZF,Chen LX,et al.Which is best for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:balloon kyphoplasty,percutaneous vertebroplasty or non-surgical treatment?A study protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(1):e012937.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012937.[13]Chen B,Fan S,Zhao F.Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compressionfractures with intravertebral cleft[J].Indian J Orthop,2014,48(1):53-59.doi:10.4103/0019-5413.125498.[14]Pingel A,Kandziora F,Hoffmann CH.Osteoporotic L1 burst fracture treated by short-segment percutaneousstabilization with cement-augmented screws and kyphoplasty(hybridtechnique) [J].Eur Spine J,2014,23(9):2022-2023.doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3496-3.[15]Li LH,Sun TS,Liu Z,et al.Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty fortreating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:a meta-analysis[J].Chin Med J(Engl),2013,126(20):3956-3961.
[1] 王干生, 陈峰, 倪生华, 秦红明. 经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者40例疗效观察#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 419-422.
[2] 王欣文, 刘继军, 王文涛, 吴起宁, 郝定均, 屈巍.  

3D打印技术在经皮椎体成形术中的临床应用 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 321-326.

[3] 岑毕文,王达义,尚晖,吴亚鹏,杨棋. Ponte截骨联合骨水泥强化治疗胸腰段陈旧性骨质疏松骨折并后凸畸形[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 125-130.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed