Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (1): 22-25    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.01.006
  临床论著 |
TST术中荷包缝合深度对治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔临床疗效的影响
程志强1,陈朝晖1,肖辉2,张瑞芳1,陈林1,陈红霞1,范永强1
1.成都医学院第一附属医院肛肠科,成都 610500; 2.贵州医科大学附属医院急诊ICU,贵阳 550025
The Effect on the Depth of Purse-string Suture in Tissue Selecting Technique for Mixed Hemorrhoid withGrade Ⅲ and Ⅳ
CHENG Zhi-qiang1,CHEN Zhao-hui1,XIAO Hui2,ZHANG Rui-fang1,CHEN Lin1,CHEN Hong-xia1,FAN Yong-qiang
1.Department?of?Anorectum,The?First?Affiliated?Hospital?of?Chengdu?Medical?College,Chengdu?610500,Sichuan,China; 2.Department?of?Emergency,The?Affiliated?Hospital?of?Guizhou?Medcial?University,Guiyang?550025,Guizhou,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (183KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨TST术中荷包缝合深度对治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔临床疗效的影响。方法 回顾性分析2016年3月~2017年2月采用TST术治疗的140例Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔患者的临床资料,按病理结果分为两组:切除的直肠黏膜组织标本中有少量平滑肌组织者为观察组(73例),其中Ⅲ度混合痔61例,Ⅳ度12例;仅有直肠黏膜组织而无平滑肌组织者为对照组(67例),其中Ⅲ度50例,Ⅳ度17例。结果 观察组术中出血量、术中吻合口活动性出血缝扎率、术后肛门坠胀、切除组织重量与体积、肛缘水肿 (术后3、7、10d)情况均优于对照组(P<0.05),而两组术后疼痛评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后患者随访3~6月,两组均无肛门狭窄及肛门失禁等并发症发生。观察组复发3例(4.10%),对照组复发9例(13.43%),组间比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.875,P=0.049)。结论 TST术中荷包缝合深度达直肠壁略带肌层可减少术后并发症发生,降低远期复发率。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
程志强
关键词:    选择性痔上黏膜吻合术  荷包缝合术    
Abstract: ?Objective?To investigate the effect of purse-string suturedepth in tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST) for the treatment of mixedhemorrhoid with grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ.Methods?A total of 140 mixedhemorrhoid cases performed TST in ourhospital from March 2016 to February 2017 weredivided into the observation group with a slight of smooth muscle tissue (n=73) and control group without smooth muscle tissue (n=67) according to pathological result of excisional rectal mucous tissue.Thehemorrhoids was graded Ⅲ in 61cases and Ⅳ in 12 cases of the observation group,and Ⅲ in 50 cases and Ⅳ in 17 cases of the control group.Results?The intra-operative bleeding volume,the intra-operative transfixion ratedue to active bleeding of anastomotic stoma,the anal swelling,the weight and volume of the resected tissue and the edema of anal edge at 3-,7- and 10days after the surgery in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05).There was no statisticaldifference in postoperative pain score between the two groups (P>0.05).No anal stenosis and anal incontinence was found in both groups after 3 to 6 months follow-up.The recurrence rate was 4.10% of the observation group,and was lower than 13.43% of the control group,and thedifference was statistically between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion?Thedepth of purse string suture to the rectal wall with slight muscle layer in TST can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and the long-term recurrence rate.
Key words:  hemorrhoids    tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST)    purse-string suture
                    发布日期:  2018-08-13      期的出版日期:  2018-08-13
ZTFLH:  R657.18  
通讯作者:  陈朝晖   
作者简介:  ?程志强,男,29岁,成都医学院第一附属医院肛肠外科医师,在读研究生。
引用本文:    
程志强. TST术中荷包缝合深度对治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔临床疗效的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 22-25.
CHENG Zhi-qiang. The Effect on the Depth of Purse-string Suture in Tissue Selecting Technique for Mixed Hemorrhoid withGrade Ⅲ and Ⅳ. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(1): 22-25.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.01.006  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I1/22
[1] Singer M,Abcarian H.Stapledhemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage[J].Clin Colon Rectal Surg,2004,17(2):131-142.doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828660.|[2] 林宏城,任东林,谢尚奎,等.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术与痔上黏膜环切钉合术的对比研究[J].广东医学,2011,32(11):1457-1460.|[3] Wewers ME,Lowe NK.A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena[J].Res Nurs Health,1990,13(4):227-236.|[4] 郁宝铭,林建江,吴唯勤,等.微粒化纯化的黄酮成分治疗痔急性发作的多中心自身对照临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19 (3 ): 722-724.|[5] Thomson WH.The nature and cause ofhaemorrhoids[J].Proc R Soc Med,1975,68(9):574-575.|[6] Jeong H,Hwang S,Ryu KO,et al.Early experience with a partial stapledhemorrhoidopexy for treating patients with grades Ⅲ~Ⅳ prolapsinghemorrhoids[J].Ann Coloproctol,2017,33(1):28-34.doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.28.|[7] 石光炳,张博志.PPH 结合直肠黏膜缝扎术治疗环状混合痔疗效观察[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2014,1(9):35-36.|[8] 吴咏雄.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠脱垂的疗效分析[J].当代医学,2014,20(34):27-28.|[9] 关维雨,张德巍,李春雨.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术治疗内痔的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2012,20(19):1752-1757.|[10] 蒋应祥,张平,杜仲代.TST术治疗混合痔合并肛门坠胀的体会(附60例病例报告)[J].结直肠肛门外科,2015(2):147-148.|[11] Kopelman D,Hatoum OA,Kimmel B,et al.Compression gastrointestinal anastomosis[J].Expert Rev Med Devices,2007,4(6):821-828.|[12] 李明琦,张博森,陈海鹏,等.关于结直肠癌梗阻患者肠道吻合研究进展[J].中华普外科手术学杂志( 电子版) ,2011,5(3):59-60.|[13] 杨向东,余腾江,理习阳,等.TST联合外剥内扎术预防环状混合痔 术后肛缘水肿的临床观察(附100例报告)[J].结直肠肛门外科,2013,19(1):36-38.|[14] 胡祥.胃癌手术的基本技术[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(6):401.
[1] 姚齐贤1,张天2. PPH术与Milligan-Morgan术治疗环状痔的临床效果对照分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 104-107.
[2] 雷庆军1,张毅强1,王益1,贺向东2. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切订合术联合聚桂醇硬化剂注射治疗重度痔:86例疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 22-26.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed