Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (3): 217-221    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.014
  临床论著 |
耳内窥镜与耳科显微镜下耳屏软骨-软骨膜鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔
吴照红
新疆生产建设兵团医院耳鼻喉科,乌鲁木齐 830000
Endoscopic VS Microscopic Myringoplasty with Tragus Cartilage Perichondrium for Tympanic Perforation
WU Zhaohong
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Hospital, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (558KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨耳内窥镜与耳科显微镜下应用耳屏软骨-软骨膜行鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔的效果。方法回顾2015年5月~2016年1月于我科接受鼓膜修补术的142例鼓膜穿孔患者的临床资料,按手术方式分为耳内镜组及显微镜组,各71例,分别采用耳内镜下耳屏软骨-软骨膜鼓膜修补术和显微镜下耳屏软骨-软骨膜鼓膜修补术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量,术后1个月、3~6个月、1~2年鼓膜愈合率以及听阈情况。结果耳内镜组手术时间短于显微镜组,术中出血量少于显微镜组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1个月、3~6个月及1~2年两组间鼓膜愈合率和再穿孔率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1个月、3个月两组平均气导听阈、平均气骨导差均较术前不同程度降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间平均气导听阈、平均气骨差比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年随访,无鼓膜萎缩、鼓室粘连及移植物外移等情况。结论耳内镜下耳屏软骨-软骨膜修补鼓膜穿孔可以获得与传统术式相同的临床疗效,但手术时间更短、创伤更小,值得临床推广。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴照红
关键词:  耳屏软骨-软骨膜  鼓膜成形术  鼓膜穿孔  耳内镜检查    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of myringoplasty with tragus cartilage perichondrium under the otoendoscope and microscope in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforation.Methods142 patients with tympanic perforation received the myringoplasty with tragus cartilage perichondrium in our department from May 2015 to January 2016 were divided into two groups, with 71 cases for each: The endoscope group was performed the tympanic membrane repairing under otoendoscope, while the microscope group was performed the same procedure under microscope. The effect was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operative time was shorter and the intraoperative blood loss was less in the endoscope group than those in the microscope group, and the differences were statistically (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in tympanic membrane repair rate and reperforation rate at the time of 1 month, 3 to 6 months and 1 to 2 years after the surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). Both the average air conduction threshold and the air bone guide distance was decreased in 1 month and 3 months after the surgery than those before the surgery in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the average air conduction threshold and the air bone guide distance in 1 month and 3 months after the operation between the two groups (P>0.05). After 1 years of followup, there were no tympanic membrane atrophy, tympanic adhesion and graft displacement.ConclusionEndoscopic myringoplasty with tragus cartilage perichondrium can achieve the same clinical effect as well as the microscopy, but it has shorter operation time and milder trauma, and is worthy of clinical popularization.
Key words:  tragus cartilage perichondrium    myringoplasty    tympanic membrane perforation    endoscopy
               出版日期:  2018-06-26      发布日期:  2018-09-05      期的出版日期:  2018-06-26
ZTFLH:  R764.29  
作者简介:  吴照红,女,45岁,新疆生产建设兵团医院耳鼻喉科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
吴照红. 耳内窥镜与耳科显微镜下耳屏软骨-软骨膜鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(3): 217-221.
WU Zhaohong. Endoscopic VS Microscopic Myringoplasty with Tragus Cartilage Perichondrium for Tympanic Perforation. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(3): 217-221.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.014  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I3/217
[1] Tarabichi M, Ayache S, Nogueira JF, et al. Endoscopic management of chronic otitis media and tympanoplasty[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2013, 46(2):155163. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.12.002.
[2] Dündar R, Kulduk E, Soy FK, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 78(7):10841089. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.013.
[3] 杨启梅, 张文, 韩想利, 等. 耳内镜下耳屏软骨软骨膜治疗鼓膜穿孔的临床研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2016,14(6):778781.
[4] 陈菁华, 李蕾, 王晓侠.自体脂肪及耳屏软骨-软骨膜修补外伤性鼓膜穿孔的疗效观察[J]. 陕西医学,2015,44(2):252253.
[5] 詹水涌, 丁锐荣, 刘扬, 等. 耳窥镜辅助下应用耳屏软骨-软骨膜进行鼓膜修补术的临床分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2014,9(6):3738.
[6] 李琴, 罗伟国, 韩丽. 耳屏软骨膜行鼓膜成形术的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国医药指南,2013,11(17):130.
[7] 鞠丽娴, 李井成, 罗松. 耳显微镜下应用耳屏软骨-软骨膜复合体行鼓膜修补术的疗效[J]. 实用临床医学,2014,15(2):8788.
[8] Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, et al. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty for tympanic perforations: An outpatient minimally invasive procedure[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2018, 45(3):433439. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.07.003.
[9] Lade H, Choudhary SR, Vashishth A. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 271(7):18971902. doi: 10.1007/s004050132673z.
[10] Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, et al. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty for anterior perforations of the tympanic membrane[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142(11):10881093. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2114.
[11] 宋纪军, 刘宏建. 耳屏软骨-软骨膜鼓膜成形术的疗效观察[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2013,21(4):258260.
[12] 邓晓聪, 邵永良, 李春林. 带薄层软骨的耳屏软骨膜修补鼓膜紧张部巨大穿孔的临床效果[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,29(4):361362.
[13] Awad OG, Hamid KA. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 141(6):532538. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0601.
[14] Eren SB, Tugrul S, Ozucer B, et al. Endoscopic transcanal inlay myringoplasty: Alternative approach for anterior perforations[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 153(5):891893. doi: 10.1177/0194599815599969.
[15] Zhang ZG, Huang QH, Zheng YQ, et al. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2011, 32(8):12341238. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822f0ba7.
No related articles found!
[1] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 168 -173 .
[2] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 174 -177 .
[3] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 178 -181 .
[4] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 182 -186 .
[5] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 187 -190 .
[6] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 191 -193 .
[7] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 194 -196 .
[8] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 197 -200 .
[9] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 201 -205 .
[10] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 206 -210 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed