Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (3): 192-195    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.008
  临床论著 |
椎间盘镜微创手术与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症临床疗效比较
万里,廖中东
湖北省黄石市第二医院骨科, 黄石 435002
The Comparison of Miniinvasive Intervertebral Diskoscopy and Traditional Open Surgery for Gluteal Muscle Contracture
WAN Li, LIAO Zhongdong 
Department of Orthopaedics, Second Hospital of Huangshi, Huangshi 435002, Hubei, China
下载: 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的比较椎间盘镜微创手术和传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的疗效及可行性。 方法回顾性分析2003年6月~2012年6月期间收治的73例双侧臀肌挛缩症患者的临床资料,其中采用椎间盘镜微创治疗38例(椎间盘镜治疗组),行传统开放手术治疗35例(开放手术组)。比较两组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后并发症及术后住院时间,评价两组患者手术疗效,对患者步态、交腿试验、并腿下蹲及弹跳感指标进行比较。结果两组患者均获随访,随访时间平均18.3(13~36)个月。两组手术切口长度、术中出血量及术后住院时间比较,椎间盘镜组明显优于传统开放手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均未发生神经损伤。椎间盘镜组术后出现切口血肿1例,经加压包扎、沙袋压迫后治愈,其余病例切口均一期愈合,术后并发症发生率为2.6%。开放手术组术后出现切口血肿6例,其中3例出现切口感染,经换药引流后治愈, 术后并发症发生率为17.1%。两组术后并发症发生率比较, 差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。术后1年两组疗效比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论椎间盘镜微创治疗臀肌挛缩症疗效可靠,创伤小,术中出血少,术后并发症少,患者恢复快。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
WAN Li
LIAO Zhongdong
关键词:  臀肌挛缩症  椎间盘镜检查    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and feasibility of miniinvasive intervertebral diskoscopy and traditional open surgery for gluteal muscle contracture(GMC).MethodsThe clinical data of 73 cases of bilateral GMC from June 2003 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Of which 38 cases were treated with minimally invasive intervertebral diskoscopy(as the diskoscopy group), and 35 cases were treated by traditional open surgery (as the open operation group). The operation time, the length of the incision, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the postoperative complications and the time of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. The curative effect of the two groups was evaluated, including the gait, the leg test, the leg squat and the jumping sensation were compared.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 13 to 36 months with an average of 18.3 months. The length of the surgical incision was shorter, the amount of bleeding was less and the hospital stays time after the operation was shorter in the diskoscopy group than those in the open operation group, and the differences were statistically (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups(P>0.05). No nerve injuries were found in both groups. One case (2.6%) was found incision hematoma in the diskoscopy group, and was cured by compression bandage and sand bag oppression. There were 6 cases (17.1%) of incision hematoma in open operation group, including 3 cases of incision infection, and cured by dressing change and drainage. There was a statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P<0.05). No significant difference appeared in the curative effect between the two groups 1 years after operation (P>0.05).ConclusionMinimally invasive intervertebral diskoscopy is reliable and effective for GMC with minitrauma, less intraoperative bleeding, fewer postoperative complications and faster recovery.
Key words:  gluteus contracture    diskoscopy
               出版日期:  2018-06-26      发布日期:  2018-09-05      期的出版日期:  2018-06-26
ZTFLH:  R687.2  
作者简介:  万里,男,42岁,湖北省黄石市第二医院骨科主任医师。
引用本文:    
万里,廖中东. 椎间盘镜微创手术与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(3): 192-195.
WAN Li, LIAO Zhongdong. The Comparison of Miniinvasive Intervertebral Diskoscopy and Traditional Open Surgery for Gluteal Muscle Contracture. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(3): 192-195.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.03.008  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I3/192
[1] 戴祝, 范伟杰, 廖瑛, 等. 青年臀肌筋膜挛缩症近期疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2009,23(12):15251526.
[2] 詹远平. 关节镜与传统开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的比较研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2012, 20(17):15641567.
[3] 张忠, 戴晓明, 周清碧, 等. 微创手术治疗儿童注射性臀肌挛缩症[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2005,9(3):222222.
[4] 蔡斌, 王志刚,蔡海青, 等. 儿童臀肌挛缩症的手术治疗及术后功能锻炼[J]. 中国临床康复,2004,8(33):74887489.
[5] 刘宏, 李欣, 方科, 等. 椎间盘镜治疗臀肌挛缩症的初步对比分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(7):656658.
[6] 廖中东, 万里, 黄峰. 椎间盘镜系统微创治疗臀肌挛缩症[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2006,21(9):708710.
[7] 万里, 廖中东, 孙杰. 内镜治疗注射性臀肌挛缩症的初步探讨[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2014(10):937938.
[8] 田向东, 陈宇明, 林顺福, 等. 关节镜下治疗臀肌挛缩症的应用体会[J]. 实用骨科杂志,2009,15(10):754756.
[9] 刘喜平, 刘宏. 椎间盘镜下微创治疗儿童臀肌挛缩症的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志 , 2011,19(1):5152.
[1] 杨俊贵,陈禄,崔建德. 上肢微型游离皮瓣修复手指皮瓣缺损[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 301-304.
[2] 肖永杰,焦文仓. 钩刀微创治疗腕管综合征的临床观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 319-320.
[1] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 168 -173 .
[2] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 174 -177 .
[3] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 178 -181 .
[4] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 182 -186 .
[5] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 187 -190 .
[6] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 191 -193 .
[7] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 194 -196 .
[8] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 197 -200 .
[9] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 201 -205 .
[10] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 206 -210 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed