Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (4): 265-268 DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.006 |
| Clinical Research |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clinical Research on Three-gap Drainage for Perianal Abscess |
| HONG Wen，LIU Yang,YANG Bo,ZHANG Zhong-wei,LU Ming
|
| Department?of?Colorectal?Surgery,Center?of?Digestive?and?Vascular?Surgery,the?First?Affiliated?Hospital?of?Xinjiang?Medical?University,Urumqi830054,Xinjiang,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effect of three-gap drainage in the treatment of perianal abscess.MethodsA total of 94 perianal abscess patients were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group (n=49) were performed three-gap drainage treatment: Based on the incision of the abscess, the submucosal space between mucosal and internal sphincter, the musculus sphincter space between internal sphincter and external sphincter, and the external sphincter space located on the outside the sphincter were cut open and draining adequately. The control group (n=45) were performed incision-thread-drawing procedure. The effect, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, complication rate and patients' satisfaction rate were compared between two groups.ResultsThe cure rate and the improvement rate was 83.67% and 16.33% respectively in the observation group, and was 86.67% and 13.33% respectively in the control group, there was no statistical difference between two groups (P>0.05). No statistical difference was found in the VAS score of the first postoperative defecation between two groups (P>0.05), but the VAS score of 1-week after the operation appeared statistical difference, and the score of the observation group was significantly lower (P<0.05). No one was found abscess relapse. There was no statistical difference in the anal fistula formation rate between two groups (P>0.05), while the anal dysfunction rate was lower and the patients satisfaction rate was higher in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionThree-gap drainage is a feasible and effective method for the treatment of perianal abscess with the advantages of mild postoperative pain, protection of anus function and high patient satisfaction, which can be an ideal procedure for perianal abscess.
|
|
Published: 15 May 2018
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LU Ming
|
|
|
| [1] |
丁义江. 肛周脓肿和肛瘘的病因病理[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.35.|
|
| [2] |
谢永俊, 常家聪. 手术切开引流对肛周脓肿患者肛瘘形成的防治效果[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2014,23(9):1299-1302. |
|
| [3] |
Beck DE, Roberts PL, Saclarides TJ, et al. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery[M]. New York：Springer, 2011. 221. |
|
| [4] |
史刚刚. 不同方法治疗肛周脓肿500例对比分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2011,40(8):1041-1042. |
|
| [5] |
王伟雄, 冯骏, 汪普宁， 等. 小切口负压封闭引流技术治疗较大急性肛周深部脓肿[J]. 广东医学,2010,31(3):363-364. |
|
| [6] |
King SK. Should we seek a fistula-in-ano when draining a perianal abscess?[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2010, 46(5):273-274. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01694.x. |
|
| [7] |
彭冀. 肛周脓肿一次性根治术188例治疗体会[J]. 河北中医,2012,34(8):1269-1270. |
|
| [8] |
高晶, 张少军, 应光耀等. 改道置管肛外引流术治疗直肠黏膜下脓肿的临床疗效[J]. 世界临床医学,2016,10(16):5-6. |
|
| [9] |
Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E, et al. German S3 guideline: anal abscess[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012, 27(6):831-837. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1430-x. |
|
| [10] |
罗永. 开窗置管引流加挂线术一次性根治肛周脓肿:附214例报告[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2011,20(10):1146-1148. |
|
| [11] |
师源. 肛周脓肿一次性根治术103例疗效分析[J]. 现代临床医学，2011， 37(5)：361-362. |
|
| [12] |
陈滟, 王小峰, 金黑鹰， 等. 三间隙引流术治疗肛周脓肿的可行性探讨[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(4):442-445. |
|
| [13] |
江期华， 江期望. 一次性根治肛周脓肿的临床观察[J]. 实用临床医学，2012， 13(8)：44-45. |
|
| [14] |
彭光生, 陈怡, 马红英， 等. 三探头联合应用在诊断肛周脓肿及伴发肛瘘中的价值[J]. 中国当代医药,2012,19(32):7-9. |
|
| [15] |
阿力马斯·阿斯哈尔. 瘘性肛周脓肿瘘管一期切开的治疗体会(附556 例报道)[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2013,14(2):120.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
