SuperPATH切口微创人工全髋关节置换术临床应用价值分析

doi:10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.0010

Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery

2017, Vol. 21

Issue (4): 283-287 DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.0010

Clinical Research

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of SuperPATH and Anterolatera Small Incision Approach in Primary THA forthe Treatment of Ischemic Necrosis of Femoral Heads

HAN Jie，CHEN Jing-yong，SI Yan，ZHU Jiang-wei

Department?of?Orthopedics,Hospital?of?Sichuan?Province，Chengdu610001，Sichuan，China

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download:

HTML

PDF (220KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo compare the short-term clinical efficacy between the SuperPATH minimally invasive approach and the anterolatera small incision approach in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of ischemic necrosis of femoral heads.Methods80 cases diagnosed as ischemic necrosis of the femoral head were planned to be treated with THA. All the cases were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group (both n=40). The observation group was treated with the SuperPATH approach, while the control group was treated with the anterolatera small incision approach. Between the two groups , the differences of the incision length, operative time, intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale(VAS)， and the thigh circumference difference before operation and one day after operation were compared. The Harris score of hip and Barthel index were also compared before operation and 3 months after operation. The 3-month postoperative complications were observed as well.ResultsOperative time of the observation group was longer but the intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage and hospitalization time were all less than that of the control group(P<0.05). The ESR, CRP, thigh circumference difference and VAS of the observation group were lower than the control group, while the Harris score and Barthel index were higher than the control group(P<0.05).ConclusionEarly results demonstrate that the SuperPATH approaches can be adopted with minimal complications and better outcomes comparing with the anterolatera small incision approach.

Key words： femur head necrosis arthroplasty, replacement, hip SuperPATH minimally invasive approach anterolatera small incision approach

Published: 15 May 2018

ZTFLH:

R681.8

Corresponding Authors: CHEN Jing-yong

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HAN?Jie，CHEN?Jing-yong，SI?Yan，ZHU?Jiang-wei

Cite this article:

HAN?Jie，CHEN?Jing-yong，SI?Yan，ZHU?Jiang-wei. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of SuperPATH and Anterolatera Small Incision Approach in Primary THA forthe Treatment of Ischemic Necrosis of Femoral Heads[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(4): 283-287.

URL:

http://www.surgerychina.com/EN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.0010 OR http://www.surgerychina.com/EN/Y2017/V21/I4/283

[1]	Mehrotra A, Sloss EM, Hussey PS,et al.Evaluation of centers of excellence program for knee and hip replacement[J]. Med Care, 2013,51(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182699407.\|
[2]	林祥波，王建然，李从达，等. 微创前外侧入路髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2014，22(24)：2219-2224.\|
[3]	谷绍芳，辛晓春，成玉芙. 两种小切口入路在人工全髋关节置换术中的疗效研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志，2013,17(4)：293-295.\|
[4]	中华医学会骨科分会显微修复学组，中国修复重建外科专业委员会骨缺损及骨坏死学组．成人股骨头坏死诊疗标准专家共识(2012年版)[J]．中华骨科杂志，2012，32(6)：606-610．\|
[5]	周锦春，郭敦明，王青，等．股骨颈骨折闭合复位加压螺纹钉内固定术后股骨头坏死多中心多因素相关分析[J]．中华骨科杂志，2013，33(5)：549-554．\|
[6]	张先龙, 吴海山, 戴尅戎. 人工关节置换临床实践与思考[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2012. 1-22.\|
[7]	曾昭池, 郭中凯, 朱志勇, 等. 微创与常规全髋关节置换术临床疗效比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(12): 1173-1175.\|
[8]	Rasuli KJ, Gofton W. Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip(SuperPATH) arthroplasty: learning curves and early outcomes[J]. Ann Transl Med， 2015 ，3(13):179. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.08.02.\|
[9]	J?msen E, Eskelinen A, Peltola M, et al. High early failure rate after cementless hip replacement in the octogenarian[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014,472(9):2779-2789. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3641-7.\|
[10]	Glassou EN, Pedersen AB, Hansen TB. Risk of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of total hip and knee arthroplastyin fast-track departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011[J].Acta Orthop, 2014,85(5):493-500. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.942586.\|
[11]	郑占乐，杨磊，张奇，等．髋关节置换术后双下肢不等长原因分析[J]．河北医科大学学报，2013，34(11)：1452-1453．\|
[12]	佟大可，贺倩芸，刘康，等. SuperPATH 入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的短期疗效评价[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2017,32(3)：308-310.\|
[13]	万里，叶娜，廖中东，等. 内窥镜干预微创置入中空加压钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的探讨[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志，2015,19(6)：448-450.\|
[14]	李金泉，黄青松，徐皓，等. SuperPATH 和后外侧小切口入路THA 治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的近期疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2017,32(3)：244-247.\|
[15]	任东伟，杨革军，赵华磊，等. SuperPATH切口微创人工全髋关节置换术对股骨头坏死疗效及生活质量的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报，2016,37(12)：1416-1419.\|
[16]	Zhang XL, Cheng T, Zeng BF, et al. Experts' consensus on minimally invasive surgery for total arthroplasty[J]. Orthop Surg，2011,3(3):147-151.\|
[17]	姚坚，丁海. SuperPath微创人工全髋关节置换术的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志，2016,9(30):1170-1173.\|