Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (6): 445-448    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.012
  临床论著 |
关节镜引导下植骨、缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折不愈合
徐海涛1, 朱威宏2, 曹斌1, 舒子震1
1.湖南省第二人民医院骨科,长沙 410007;2.中南大学湘雅二医院骨科,长沙 410011
Arthroscope-guided Bone Grafting and Suture Fixation for Nonunion of Tibia Intercondylar Eminence Fracture
XU Hai-tao1,ZHU Wei-hong2,CAO Bin1,SHU Zi-zhen1
1.Department of Orthopaedics,The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province,Changsha410007,Hunan,China; 2.Department of Orthopaedics,The Second Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha410011,Hunan,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (185KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨关节镜引导下植骨、缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折不愈合的临床疗效和安全性。方法2014年7月~2016年10月共收治胫骨髁间嵴骨折不愈合患者8例,其中Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型4例,均采用关节镜引导下植骨、缝线内固定治疗。评估患者术前、术后3月、6月、12月Lysholm膝关节功能评分、 关节活动度, 前抽屉试验、 Lachman试验评估关节稳定性, 摄X片观察有无关节游离体。结果本组6例合并半月板损伤,其中内侧半月板损伤2例,外侧半月板损伤1例,内外侧半月板均有损伤3例;4例合并关节软骨损伤;自体骨植骨6例,同种异体骨植骨2例。7例获得随访,平均14.6(12~20)个月,1例术后2月失访。所有患膝术后8周均可完全伸直,屈曲130°以上。术后3月随访6例骨折愈合, 1例术后4月复诊愈合。术后6月、 12月5例ADT(-), 2例ADT(+)(关节较健侧稍松弛, 但有明确止点);5例Lachman试验(-),2例(+),但患者均无关节不稳定感,不需手术治疗。7例随访12月未见关节游离体。Lysholm膝关节评分: 术前平均(82.9±7.3)分, 术后6月随访平均(91.4±7.1)分, 较术前显著提高(t=8.042,P<0.05);术后12月随访平均(96.6±4.6)分,亦较术前显著提高(t=9.731,P<0.05)。结论关节镜引导下植骨、缝线内固定是治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折不愈合安全、有效方法。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐海涛1
朱威宏2
曹斌1
舒子震1
关键词:  关节镜检查  胫骨髁间嵴骨折  骨折,不愈合  膝关节    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the effect and safety of arthroscope-guided bone grafting and suture fixation for nonunion of tibia intercondylar eminence fractures.MethodsFrom July 2014 to October 2016, a total of 8 cases with tibia intercondylar eminence fracture nonunion were treated by arthroscope-guided bone grafting and fixation with suture, including 4 of type Ⅱ and 4 of type Ⅲ. Lysholm knee score and Rang of motion of knee were assessed before, 3-, 6- and 12 months after the surgery. Anterior drawer test (ADT) and Lachman test were used to evaluate knee stability. Loose bodies were observed by X-image.ResultsAll 8 cases accomplished the surgery successfully. Combined meniscus injury were found in 6 cases, including medial meniscus in 2, lateral meniscus in 1 and medial-lateral in 3; Combined articular cartilage lesion was found in 4 cases. During the surgery, autogenous bone grafting was performed in 6 cases and allogenetic bone grafting in 2 cases. Followed-up duration ranged from 12 to 20 months in 7 patients, but loss in 1 case 2 months after the surgery. All knees achieved full extention and 130° in flexion at least. The fracture healing time was 3 months in 6 cases and 4 months in 1 case. There were negative outcomes in 5 cases and positive outcomes in 2 cases in both ADT and Lachman test 6- and 12 months after the surgery, but no patient felt instable. No loose body was observed 12 months after the operation. The average Lysholm knee score of 6- and 12 months after the surgery was 91.4±7.1 and 96.6±4.6 respectively, both were improved significantly than 82.9±7.3 of pre-operation, and the differences were statistically (t=8.042,P<0.05, andt=9.731,P<0.05).ConclusionThe surgical intervention of arthroscope-guided bone grafting and suture fixation is safe and effective for fracture nonunion of tibia intercondylar eminence.
Key words:  arthroscopy    tibia intercondylar eminence fractures    fractures, ununited    knee joint
                    发布日期:  2018-05-28      期的出版日期:  2017-12-26
ZTFLH:  R683.42  
通讯作者:  朱威宏   
作者简介:  徐海涛,男,40岁,湖南省第二人民医院骨科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
徐海涛1, 朱威宏2, 曹斌1, 舒子震1. 关节镜引导下植骨、缝线内固定治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折不愈合[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 445-448.
XU Hai-tao. Arthroscope-guided Bone Grafting and Suture Fixation for Nonunion of Tibia Intercondylar Eminence Fracture. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(6): 445-448.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.012  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I6/445
[1] Senekovic V, Veselko M. Anterograde arthroscopic fixation of avulsion fractures of the tibial eminence with a cannulated screw: five-year results[J]. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(1):54-61.[2] Myeyers MH, McKeever FM. Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1959, 41-A(2):209-220.[3] Zaricznyj B. Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: treatment by open reduction and pinning[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1977, 59(8):1111-1114.[4] Lafrance RM, Giordano B, Goldblatt J, et al. Pediatric tibial eminence fractures: evaluation and management[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2010, 18(7):395-405.[5] Gans I, Baldwin KD, Ganley TJ. Treatment and management outcomes of tibial eminence fractures in pediatric patients: A systematic review[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(7):1743-1750. doi: 10.1177/0363546513508538.[6] Vargas B, Lutz N, Dutoit M, et al.Nonunion after fracture of the anterior tibial spine: case report and review of the literature[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2009, 18(2):90-92. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328329895b.[7] Horibe S, Shi K, Mitsuoka T, et al. Nonunited avulsion fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia[J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7):757-762.[8] Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of malunited and nonunited avulsion fractures of the anterior tibial spine[J].Arthroscopy, 1998, 14(3):233-240.[9] Eggers AK, Becker C, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminencefractures.[J] Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35(3):404-410.[10] Mahar AT, Duncan D, Oka R, et al. Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation techniques for pediatric tibialeminence avulsion fractures[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 2008, 28(2):159-162. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318164ee43.
[1] 刘晓辉,张雷,谢获. 关节镜下空心螺钉治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 292-295.
[2] 马振华, 李云, 徐迈, 刘玉新. 肘关节镜术后失败原因分析及对策[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 197-200.
[3] 周建国1,周华朝2,张武2,孙静锋3. 关节镜手术改善半月板退行性撕裂伤疼痛的荟萃分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 31-35.
[4] 李荣华,杜向阳,项永胜. 常压转负压引流对全膝关节置换术患者的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 40-43.
[5] 孙敏,戚超,于腾波. 经膝关节镜引导小切口与传统内固定手术治疗胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 44-47.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed