,"/> “AO”张力带治疗RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折的临床疗效对比#br#
Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (4): 254-257    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.04.004?
  临床论著 |
“AO”张力带治疗RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折的临床疗效对比#br#
文磊1,杜军2,刘宏滨1#br#
1.中国解放军第九十七医院骨外科, 江苏徐州 221004; 2. 滁州市第一人民医院骨三科, 安徽滁州 239000
The Clinical Curative Effect Comparison of "AO" Tension Band in the Treatment for Patellar Fractures of Rockwood Ⅱand Ⅲ#br#
WEN Lei1, DU Jun2, LIU Hongbin1#br#
1.Department of Orthopedics Surgery,the 97th Hospital of PLA,Xuzhou 221004,Jiangsu,China; 2. the First People's Hospital of Chuzhou,  Chuzhou 239000, Anhui, China
下载:  PDF (0KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 [摘要]目的观察和评价分析“AO”张力带原理的不同治疗方法在RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折治疗中的疗效。方法选取我院2013年10月至2017年10月期间住院并且接受手术治疗的100例RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折患者作为研究对象,按非完全随机方法将其分为观察A组、观察B组和对照C组、对照D组,观察A组采用钢缆和带孔克氏针“8”字捆绑固定,观察B组采用钢缆和带孔克氏针“0”字捆绑固定;对照C组采用普通克氏针、钢丝“8”字捆绑固定,对照D组采用普通克氏针、钢丝“0”字捆绑固定,比较各组间患者术后半年膝关节活动功能、骨折愈合情况及并发症发生率。结果所有研究对象均获得随访,观察A、B组与对照C、D组之间两两组间比较,膝关节活动度及髌骨骨折愈合时间未见显著差异(P>0.05),对照组术后并发症发生率高于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论普通克氏针、钢丝张力带与带孔克氏针、钢缆张力带内固定术操作简单,学习曲线短,均能很好地治愈RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折,效果良好,而且带孔克氏针、钢缆张力带术后并发症更少,适合在基层医院推广使用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
文磊
杜军
刘宏滨
关键词:     髌骨骨折;带孔克氏针;张力带
    
Abstract: Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate and analyze the efficacy of different treatments of "AO" tension band for patella fractures of Rockwood Ⅱ and Ⅲ.MethodsThere were 100 cases with Rockwood Ⅱ and Ⅲ patellar fractures were enrolled in this study in our hospital during October 2013 to October 2017. They were incompletely randomly divided into group A (the observation group), group B (the observation group), group C (the control group), and group D (the control group). Group A was treated with a "8" steel cable and perforated Kirschner and group B was treated with a "0" steel cable and perforated Kirschner. Group C was treated with an "8" steel wire and Kirschner wire and group D was treated with a "0" steel wire and Kirschner wire. The function of knee joint activity, fracture healing time and the complication rate were compared among different groups.ResultsAll the patients were followed up. There was no significant difference in knee activity function and patella fracture healing time(P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the control groups were higher than that in the observation groups, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionsThe inner fixations of common Kirschner wires, steel wire tension bands, perforated Kirschner wires, and the steel cable all have advantages of simple procedure and short learning curve, which can be used for Rockwood Ⅱ and Ⅲ patellar fractures with good effect. Moreover, there are fewer complications after the operation of perforated Kirschner wire and steel cable, which is suitable for the promotion in the primary hospitals.

Key words:  patellar fractures    ')" href="#">perforated Kirschner;"AO" tension band
               出版日期:  2018-08-26      发布日期:  2018-10-23      期的出版日期:  2018-08-26
ZTFLH:     
  R683.42  
引用本文:    
文磊, 杜军, 刘宏滨. “AO”张力带治疗RockwoodⅡ、Ⅲ型髌骨骨折的临床疗效对比#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 254-257.
WEN Lei, DU Jun, LIU Hongbin. The Clinical Curative Effect Comparison of "AO" Tension Band in the Treatment for Patellar Fractures of Rockwood Ⅱand Ⅲ#br#. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(4): 254-257.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.04.004?  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I4/254
[1] 谭瑛, 梁曼, 张贻岚, 罗丹. 不同浓度罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼应用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的效果分析#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 311-315.
[2] 赵振山, 李海洋, 赵振兴, 代岱, 郝孟辉. 自体心包奇静脉补片肺动脉重建对中心型肺癌患者术后并发症和预后的影响#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 285-290.
[3] 许宇浪, 纪志华, 刘强, 吴小萌. 两种术式治疗股骨远端单髁或双髁冠状面骨折的疗效对比#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 277-280.
[4] 熊军, 刘韦, 黎早敏, 陈剑飞. 有或无牵引床辅助复位下股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 274-276.
[5] 丁科, 唐腾龙, 左仲坤, 彭伟辉, 张磊屹, 黄江生, 段伦喜. 腹腔镜下结肠癌手术患者术后肺部并发症的危险因素分析#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 244-247.
[6] 杨寅熙, 吴一峰, 吴铁. TEP与TAPP术治疗腹股沟疝临床疗效比较#br#[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(4): 241-243.
[1] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 168 -173 .
[2] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 174 -177 .
[3] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 178 -181 .
[4] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 182 -186 .
[5] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 187 -190 .
[6] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 191 -193 .
[7] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 194 -196 .
[8] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 197 -200 .
[9] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 201 -205 .
[10] . [J]. Chinese journal of modern operative surgery, 2017, 21(3): 206 -210 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed