Abstract: Objective To analyze the postoperative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective review of 110 TKA cases completed in our department from October 2008 to October 2017 were conducted. Results All 110 patients successfully completed the operation without obvious complications. One weeks after operation, the knee joint activity improved from 6.54°±17.93° to 107.20°±11.41°, and the HSS score improved from 50.48±8.40 to 90.60±3.61, which were significantly higher than the pre-operative ones (P<0.05). Although the knee joint activity and HSS decreased slightly after 6 months, but there were still higher than before the pre-operative ones (P<0.05). The knee function score was excellent in 95 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 10 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 90.1%. Conclusion The key to TRA is correct selection of cases before operation, proper grasp of operative pointers, correct osteotomy and soft tissue balance during operation.
汪更胜,朱新林,殷丹. 老年患者全膝关节置换术后疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(2): 142-144.
WANG Geng-sheng. Clinical Results of the Total Knee Arthoplasty in the Aged. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(2): 142-144.
[1] Wang Z, Wei M, Zhang Q, et al. Comparison of high-flexion and conventional implants in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21:1679-1686. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893112.|[2] 周一新, 邵宏翊, 唐竟, 等. 不同年龄患者人工膝关节置换术后疗效与围术期并发症分析[J]. 中国外科杂志,2009,47(11):833-836.|[3] 张国宁, 王友. 膝关节评分标准的评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(16):1141-1143.|[4] 韩宁, 姚建华. 膝关节置换术功能评分方法优缺点对比[J]. 医学综述,2015,21(21):3919-3921.|[5] Davies AP. Rating systems for total knee replacement[J]. Knee, 2002 ,9(4):261-266.|[6] Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83-A(12):1856-1864.|[7] 谭海涛, 陈铖, 曾跃林, 等. 全膝关节置换手术期应用氨甲环酸的研究与分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(6):48-49.