Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (4): 274-278    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.008
  临床论著 |
ROI-C前路手术治疗无椎节不稳、骨折或脱位TCDH临床疗效观察
彭辉,庄小强,陆生林,白宇,方旭,黄晖
广西医科大学附属民族医院, 南宁 530001
Clinical Observation of ROI-C Anterior Surgical Treatment of TCDH without Vertebral Instability,Fracture orDislocation
PENG Hui,ZHUANG Xiao-qiang,LU Sheng-lin,BAI Yu,FANG Xu,HUANG Hui
ffiliated?Minzu?Hospital?of?Guangxi?Medical?University,Nanning530021,Guangxi,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (487KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨无椎节不稳、骨折或脱位的创伤性颈椎间盘突出(traumatic cervical disc herniation, TCDH)患者单独采取双插片自稳式融合系统(double-plate self-locking interbody fusion device,商品名ROI-C)前路手术治疗的初期效果并对该手术方法进行评价。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2016年1月于我院治疗的TCDH患者120例,观察比较应用ROI-C前路手术治疗前后日本骨科协会评分 (Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, JOA)、 视觉疼痛模拟评分 (visual analogue scale, VAS)、 颈椎功能障碍指数(neck disability index, NDI)、 颈椎整体曲度的改变及椎间高度, 依据Vaccraro标准对植骨融合情况进行评估, 应用Odom法对手术治疗效果进行评定。结果120例患者均获得随访,随访时间13~34个月,平均19.5个月。手术前至末次随访评分的比较,治疗后JOA评分由4.4±3.9增加为13.9±2.7; VAS评分由6.4±2.1下降为1.1±0.8; NDI评分由38.3%±11.8%减少为8.8%±3.3%,末次随访前与术前的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后椎间高度由(5.3±1.6)mm增加为(7.9±0.7)mm,颈椎曲度由5.2°±7.4°增加为10.6°±5.2°,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后2周声音嘶哑患者症状消失,术后3个月吞咽困难患者症状消失,术后6个月120例节段均发生骨性融合,随访期间无ROI-C下沉、移位及断裂现象的发生。依据Odom标准评优率为76.5%。结论单独采取ROI-C前路手术方式治疗无椎节不稳、骨折或脱位的TCDH患者,确实具有治疗效果较好、融合率高及并发症少等优势,ROI-C前路固定融合治疗是一种可靠的微创手术方法,值得临床推广。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
PENG?Hui
ZHUANG?Xiao-qiang,LU?Sheng-lin
BAI?Yu
FANG?Xu
HUANG?Hui
关键词:  双插片自稳式融合系统  颈椎损伤  椎间盘移位  椎间盘切除术  内固定器    
Abstract: ?ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of double-plate self-locking interbody fusion device (ROI-C) on the treatment of traumatic cervical disc herniation (TCDH) without vertebral instability, fracture or dislocation,and to evaluate the effect of surgery.MethodsA total of 120 patients with TCDH who were treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The pre- and post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA) and visual analogue score (VAS) were observed and compared. The neck disability index (NDI), total cervical curvature changes and intervertebral heights, Vaccraro criteria for bone graft fusion assessment, and Odom criteria were used to evaluate the surgical effects.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 13 to 34 months with an average of 19.5 months. The JOA score increased from 4.4±3.9 to 13.9±2.7 by the end of the follow-up. The VAS decreased from 6.4±2.1 to 1.1±0.8 (P<0.05); The NDI decreased from 38.3%±11.8% to 8.8%±3.3%(P<0.05). The intervertebral height increased from (5.3±1.6) mm to (7.9±0.7) mm(P<0.05); The curvature of the cervical spine increased from 5.2°±7.4 ° to 10.6°±5.2 °(P<0.05). The symptoms of hoarseness disappeared 2 months later. The symptoms of dysphagia disappeared 3 months later. All the segments got bony fusion 6 months later. There was no ROI-C sinking, displacement or fracture phenomenon occurred. According to the Odom criteria, the excellent rate was 76.7%(92/120).ConclusionsThe treatment of TCDH without vertebral instability, fracture or dislocation by the ROI-C anterior approach alone does have the advantages of good therapeutic effect, high fusion rate and less complication. ROI-C anterior fusion therapy is a reliable minimally invasive surgical method, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Key words:  double-chip self-stabilizing fusion system    cervical vertebral injury    intervertebral disk displacement    discectomy    internal fixator
               出版日期:  2017-08-26      发布日期:  2018-05-15      期的出版日期:  2017-08-26
ZTFLH:  R681.5  
通讯作者:  彭辉,男,34岁,广西医科大学附属民族医院主治医师。   
作者简介:  彭辉,男,34岁,广西医科大学附属民族医院主治医师。
引用本文:    
彭辉,庄小强,陆生林,白宇,方旭,黄晖. ROI-C前路手术治疗无椎节不稳、骨折或脱位TCDH临床疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 274-278.
PENG Hui,ZHUANG Xiao-qiang,LU Sheng-lin,BAI Yu,FANG Xu,HUANG Hui. Clinical Observation of ROI-C Anterior Surgical Treatment of TCDH without Vertebral Instability,Fracture orDislocation. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(4): 274-278.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.04.008  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I4/274
[1] Joaquim AF, Patel AA, Vaccaro AR. Cervical injuries scored according to the Subaxial Injury Classification system: An analysis of the literature[J]. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2014 ,5(2):65-70. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.139200.|
[2] 江兵, 刘立明, 曹燕庆, 等. 无前方钢板的嵌片+聚醚醚酮复合材料融合器用于外伤性颈椎问盘突出症融合术治疗的效果观察[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2012,1l(9): 682-684.|
[3] 陈常华. 两种前路减压融合方式治疗双节段脊髓型脊椎病的疗效[J]. 局解手术学杂志,2014,23(3):262-265.|
[4] Njoku I Jr, Alimi M, Leng LZ, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014,21(4):529-537. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. |
[5] 江兵, 曹燕庆, 潘宏, 等. 自稳型颈椎融合器在颈椎前路融合手术中的临床应用[J]. 中国骨伤,2015,28(4):294-299. |
[6] 俞武良, 陆建猛, 韦勇力, 等. 零切迹椎间融合固定系统治疗颈椎间盘突出症的早期疗效观察[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2012, 27(6):686-689. |
[7] Anderson DG, Albert TJ.Bone grafting, implants, and plating options for anterior cervical fusions[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2002,33(2):317-328. |
[8] 祁敏, 陈华江, 杨立利, 等. 采用新型 Zero-p 颈椎椎间融合器置入治疗颈椎病的近期疗效分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2012, 20(24):2232-2236. |
[9] 杨朝晖, 吴险峰, 邹磊. 前路减压植骨融合内固定术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J]. 安徽医学,2013,34 (1):22-24. |
[10] Wojewnik B, Ghanayem AJ, Tsitsopoulos PP, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013,22(1):135-141. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2446-1. |
[11] 杨迪, 邵海, 张骏, 等. 零切迹颈椎前路椎间融合固定系统治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国骨伤,2014,27(5):379-384. |
[12] Brembilla C, Lanterna LA, Gritti P, et al. The use of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage in subaxial cervical spine trauma: a preliminaryreport[J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2015,76(1):13-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368092. |
[13] Matthew I, Aniruddh N, Roger B, et al. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anteriorlocking plate in a single -level cervical spine fusion construct [J]. Spine J, 2014, 14(1): 128-136. |
[14] Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB 3rd,et al.Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct [J]. Spine J, 2014,14(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.088. |
[15] Grasso G, Giambartino F, Tomasello G,et al.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C peek cage: cervical alignment and patientoutcomes[J]. Eur Spine J, 2014,23 Suppl 6:S650-S657. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3553-y. |
[16] 吴成如, 张诗虎. 前路手术治疗急性单节段颈椎间盘突出 30 例[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2013,34(3):203-204. |
[17] 江兵, 朱成润, 曹燕庆, 等. 颈椎前路手术早期并发症及防范措施[J]. 疑难病杂志,2014,13(1):67-69. |
[18] 卢一生, 潘兵, 许文根, 等. Mobi-C 人工椎间盘置换治疗颈椎间盘突出症短期疗效观察[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2013,34 (4):313-316. |
[19] Kim CH, Chung CK, Hahn S. Autologous iliac bone graft with anterior plating is advantageous over the stand-alone cage for segmental lordosis in single-level cervical disc disease[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013,72(2):257-265. |
[20] Nayak AN, Stein MI, James CR, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study[J]. Spine J, 2014,14(12):3002-3010. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.011.
[1] 关雪, 吴隆延. 开放与闭合复位髓内钉内固定对股骨干骨折的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 436-439.
[2] 屈巍, 胡慧敏, 宋宗让, 郝定均, 吴起宁, 刘继军, 王欣文. 单纯后路松解寰枢椎弓根钉棒复位固定治疗难复性寰枢椎脱位[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 201-205.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed