Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (6): 436-439    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.010
  临床论著 |
开放与闭合复位髓内钉内固定对股骨干骨折的疗效及安全性比较
关雪1,吴隆延2
1.上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科,江苏苏州 215021; 2.上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院麻醉疼痛科,江苏苏州 215021
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Open and Closed Reduction and Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures
GUAN Xue1,WU Long-yan2
1.Department of Orthopedics,Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Suzhou215021,Jiangsu,China; 2Department of Anesthesiology,Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Suzhou215021,Jiangsu,China)
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (188KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的开放与闭合髓内钉内固定术式对股骨干骨折的疗效及安全性比较。方法选择2015年3月到2016年3月在医院接受手术治疗的股骨干骨折患者130例作为研究对象。根据简单数字随机表法将患者分成观察组以及对照组各65例,对照组给予闭合髓内钉内固定术式,观察组给予小切口的开放髓内钉内固定术式,随访6个月,对比两组的疗效指标,术中放射剂量,治疗前后的血红蛋白(hemoglobin, Hb)和红细胞比容(hematocrit, HCT)以及并发症情况。结果观察组的手术时间、出血量、住院时间和骨折愈合时间与对照组相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。观察组在胸部、腹部、甲状腺及性腺的放射剂量均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后7 d的Hb组内比较均明显低于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的并发症总发生率是6.16%,与对照组的13.85%相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于股骨干骨折需接受髓内钉内固定术,可考虑切口较小的开放复位,不但能够获得等同于闭合复位的疗效,而且患者接受的放射剂量也明显更低,安全性较好,值得推广。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关雪1,吴隆延2
关键词:  股骨骨折  开放复位  闭合复位  内固定器,髓内钉    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of open and closed reduction and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.Methods130 cases of femoral shaft fractures treated in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the simple digital random table method, with 65 cases for each. The control group was treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nailing, and the observation group was treated with open reduction with small incision and intramedullary nailing. The patients were followed up for 6 months, therapeutic indices were compared between the two groups, including intraoperative radiation dose, blood biochemical indices (hemoglobin and hematocrit)before and after treatment and complications.ResultsOperation time and blood loss of the observation group, as well as the length of hospital stay and fracture healing time were not statistically significant combined with the control group (P>0.05). The radiation doses of the chest, abdomen, thyroid gland and gonad of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). The 7-day postoperative Hb levels of the two groups were significantly lower than the preoperative one (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). And there was no difference of the Hct levels (P>0.05). The complication rate of the observation group was 6.16%, which was not significantly lower than the control group (P>0.05), although that was 13.85%.ConclusionThe open reduction with a small incision should be taken into consideration for femoral shaft fractures, not only for its equivalent effect of the closed reduction, but also for its low radiation dose. It is worthy of promotion.
Key words:  femoral fractures    open reduction    closed reduction    internal fixator,intramedullary nail
                    发布日期:  2018-05-28      期的出版日期:  2017-12-26
ZTFLH:  R683.4  
基金资助: 苏州市2016年度产业技术创新专项项目(编号:SYSD2016054)
通讯作者:  吴隆延   
作者简介:  关雪, 女, 34岁, 上海交通大学医学院附属苏州九龙医院骨科主治医师。
引用本文:    
关雪1,吴隆延2. 开放与闭合复位髓内钉内固定对股骨干骨折的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 436-439.
GUAN Xue. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Open and Closed Reduction and Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(6): 436-439.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.06.010  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I6/436
[1] 董贺龙, 关雪峰, 李羽西, 等. 弹性髓内钉治疗儿童股骨干骨折的疗效[J]. 临床骨科杂志,2017,20(4):480-482.[2] Gyaneshwar T, Nitesh R, Sagar T,et al.Treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures by stainless steel and titanium elastic nail system: A randomized comparative trial[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2016,19(4):213-216.[3] Zehir S,ahin E, Zehir R. Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different intramedullary nailing devices in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2015,21(6):469-476.[4] 徐海涛, 盛加根, 陆男吉, 等. 股骨干骨折闭合复位器及髓内钉进针瞄准器的研制与临床应用[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(2):104-109.[5] Ramo BA, Martus JE, Tareen N, et al. Intramedullary nailing compared with spica casts for isolated femoral fractures in four and five-year-old children[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016,98(4):267-275.[6] 艾海提·阿布都克力木,艾克拜尔·米吉提, 张亚非. 闭合复位髓内钉固定治疗股骨干骨折适应证及疗效探讨[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(2):150-151.[7] Lardelli P, Frech-D?rfler M, Holland-Cunz S, et al. Slow recovery of weight bearing after stabilization of long-bone fractures using elastic stableIntramedullary nails in children[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016 ,95(11):e2966.[8] 李宁, 刘昊楠, 龚晓峰, 等. 髓内钉治疗非典型股骨干骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016,96(17):1349-1353.[9] 兰俊, 周明平, 周崇斌, 等. 超声对股骨干骨折移位和复位及闭合复位髓内钉固定术的指导意义[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2016,25(7):616-619.[10] 黄祖成. 顺行股骨髓内钉理想进针点的研究进展[J]. 医学综述,2016,22(7):1313-1316.[11] Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Gupta N, et al. Plate augmentation with retention of intramedullary nail is effective for resistant femoral shaft non-union[J]. J Orthop, 2016,13(4):242-245.[12] Khan JA, Singh GP, Pandey A. Outcome of titanium elastic intramedullary nail in the treatment of shaft of femur fracture in children[J]. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ), 2015,13(51):195-199.
[1] 唐志强, 单远洲.

经腋窝入路单孔腔镜甲状腺手术临床疗效分析 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 18-21.

[2] 孙冶智, 余磊, 王伟, 梁宏伟.

不同方式治疗踝关节骨折伴三角韧带完全断裂的临床效果观察 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 41-44.

[3] 李谋林,周智,尹文军,万里飞,喻赣鹏,宋瑞清. 切开复位内固定联合旋髂深血管束髂骨瓣移植治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 361-365.
[4] 杨磊,王岩石. 跗骨窦入路与广泛外侧入路内固定术治疗跟骨骨折临床分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 366-370.
[5] 谢志进1,方跃2. 对下肢骨折手术患者围术期不同时间段应用依托考昔术后镇痛效果的评估[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 371-375.
[6] 何家雄,吴征杰,曾焰辉,李灿辉. 线缆张力带内固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 288-291.
[7] 彭磊,宾捷,卢吉平,肖建林,苏朝阳. 尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路与肱三头肌内外侧入路对肱骨髁间C型骨折临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 269-273.
[8] 刘晓辉,张雷,谢获. 关节镜下空心螺钉治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 292-295.
[9] 何勇,叶剑峰,简盛生. 不同固定方法对鹰嘴截骨术后肘关节功能的影响研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 121-124.
[10] 黄金河,赵玉驰,王力刚,许军. PFNA、APFLP及InterTan髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定性转子间骨折临床效果比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 136-140.
[11] 雷庆军1,张毅强1,王益1,贺向东2. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切订合术联合聚桂醇硬化剂注射治疗重度痔:86例疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 22-26.
[12] 沈小辉,杨菲1,喻伟1,刘志刚2. 不同假体髋关节置换术治疗骨质疏松性髋关节骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 36-39.
[13] 孙敏,戚超,于腾波. 经膝关节镜引导小切口与传统内固定手术治疗胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(1): 44-47.
[14] 陈敏1,李凯1,王志回1,梁坚1,马春柳1,韦尚吟1,彭宇1,李辽波2. 小切口与常规切口带缝匠肌阔筋膜张肌蒂髂骨瓣治疗股骨颈骨折的比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 432-435.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed