Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (5): 366-370    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.011
  临床论著 |
跗骨窦入路与广泛外侧入路内固定术治疗跟骨骨折临床分析
杨磊,王岩石
新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院北院骨二科,乌鲁木齐 830054
Comparison Analysis on the Internal Fixation by Tarsal Sinus Approach and Extensive Lateral Approach for Calcaneal Fractures
YANG Lei, WANG Yanshi
Department of Orthopaedics, North Branch of People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (214KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的分析比较跗骨窦入路与广泛外侧入路治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析104例跟骨骨折患者的临床资料,按不同手术入路进行分组:观察组54例,采用跗骨窦入路克氏针内固定术治疗;对照组50例,行广泛外侧入路钢板内固定术治疗;比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数、切口愈合时间、并发症发生情况、手术前后的跟骨高度、宽度、Gissane角、Bhler角、术后恢复情况及疗效优良率,以美国足踝外科协会(American orthopedic foot and ankle society, AOFAS)踝-后足评分、Maryland评分评价术后疗效。结果观察组手术时间、切口愈合时间短于对照组,术中出血量、术后住院天数少于对照组,切口愈合率明显高于对照组(98.1% VS 88.0%),并发症率低于对照组(3.7% VS 20.0%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术后跟骨高度、宽度、Gissane角、Bhler角均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),但组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后两组AOFAS踝-后足评分、Maryland评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组疗效优良率为88.9%,高于对照组的72.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用跗骨窦入路行跟骨骨折内固定术的临床疗效优于广泛外侧入路,具有创伤小、术后康复快、并发症发生少等优势,值得临床推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
YANG Lei
WANG Yanshi
关键词:  跟骨骨折  跗骨窦入路  广泛外侧入路  骨折固定术    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of internal fixation by tarsal sinus approach and extensive lateral approach for treatment of calcaneal fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 104 cases with calcaneal fractures were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical approaches, 54 cases performed internal fixation with Kirschner wire by tarsal sinus approach as the observation group, and 50 cases received internal fixation with plate by extensive lateral approach as the control group.ResultsCompare to the control group, the operation time and incision healing time were shorter, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stays was less, the incision healing rate was higher and the complication rate was lower in the observation group, and the differences were statistically between two groups (P<0.05). The height and width of calcaneus, the Gissane angle and Bhler angle were improved remarkable after the surgery than those before the surgery (P<0.05), but there were no statistical differences in them between the two groups (P>0.05). No statistical difference was found in the postoperative AOFAS anklehind foot score and Maryland score between the two groups (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of the observation group was 88.9%, which was significantly higher than 72.0% of the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionThe curative effect of internal fixation via tarsal sinus approach has the advantages of minitrauma, rapid postoperative rehabilitation and less complication, and it is superior to that of extensive lateral approach for calcaneal fractures.
Key words:  calcaneal fractures    tarsal sinus approach    extensive lateral approach    fracture fixation
               出版日期:  2017-10-26      发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-10-26
ZTFLH:  R683.42  
作者简介:  杨磊,男,40岁,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院北院骨二科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
杨磊,王岩石. 跗骨窦入路与广泛外侧入路内固定术治疗跟骨骨折临床分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 366-370.
YANG Lei, WANG Yanshi. Comparison Analysis on the Internal Fixation by Tarsal Sinus Approach and Extensive Lateral Approach for Calcaneal Fractures. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(5): 366-370.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.011  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I5/366
[1] 施忠民, 邹剑, 顾文奇, 等. 经跗骨窦间隙与外侧“L”形切口治疗SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2013,33(4):298303.
[2] Kline AJ, Anderson RB, Davis WH, et al. Minimally invasive technique versus an extensile lateral approach for intraarticular calcaneal fracture[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2013, 34(6):773780. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477607.
[3] 徐建民, 于超. 改良外侧“L”型切口与传统“L”型切口治疗跟骨骨折的比较研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(22):23132316.
[4] 李来峰, 王辉, 赵仪云, 等. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗SandersⅢ型跟骨骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(20):18501853.
[5] Veltman ES, Doornberg JN, Stufkens SA, et al. Longterm outcomes of 1,730 calcaneal fractures: systematic review of the literature[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2013, 52(4):486490. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.002.
[6] 王震. 小切口与“L”型切口治疗跟骨骨折疗效及并发症的对比研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(14):14021405.
[7] Jacquot F, Letellier T, Atchabahian A, et al. Balloon reduction and cement fixation in calcaneal articular fractures: a fiveyear experience[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(5):905910. doi: 10.1007/s002640131865x.
[8] 徐浩, 蒋元斌, 刘耀辉, 等. 传统外侧“L”形切口钢板内固定与跗骨窦小切口空心钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折的效果比较[J]. 山东医药,2015,14(1):8688.
[9] Abdelazeem A, Khedr A, Abousayed M, et al. Management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures using the limited open sinus tarsi approach and fixation by screws only technique[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(3):601606. doi: 10.1007/s002640132203z.
[10] 肖国栋, 刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志,2016,24(10):783785.
[11] 赵晶晶, 黄若昆, 雷波, 等. 三维C臂辅助下闭合复位螺钉固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(14):8992.
[12] Veltman ES, Doornberg JN, Stufkens SA, et al. Longterm outcomes of 1,730 calcaneal fractures: systematic review of the literature[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2013, 52(4):486490. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.04.002.
[13] 瞿浩, 魏世隽, 蔡贤华, 等. SandersⅢ型跟骨骨折解剖学指标的改变与术后疗效的关系[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(12):10571062.
[14] Jonas SC, Young AF, Curwen CH, et al. Functional outcome following tibiotalarcalcaneal nailing for unstable osteoporotic ankle fractures[J]. Injury, 2013, 44(7):994997. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.008.
[15] 杨攀, 章莹, 刘坚, 等. 锁定钢板内置和外置固定SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2014,32(6):716720.
[16] Fan WL, Sun HZ, Wu SY, et al. Subtalar distraction osteogenesis for posttraumatic arthritis following intraarticular calcaneal fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2013, 34(3):398402. doi: 10.1177/1071100712472039.
[17] 邓纯博, 刘学勇, 阿良, 等. 跗骨窦入路与外侧入路治疗成人跟骨关节内移位骨折的meta分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报,2016,45(9):818823.
[18] 王一民, 张晟, 王博炜, 等. 解剖型钢板与锁定钢板固定Sanders Ⅳ型跟骨骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(6):602607.
[19] Wang ZJ, Huang XL, Chu YC, et al. Applied anatomy of the calcaneocuboid articular surface for internal fixation of calcaneal fractures[J]. Injury, 2013, 44(11):14281430. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.023.
[1] 孙冶智, 余磊, 王伟, 梁宏伟.

不同方式治疗踝关节骨折伴三角韧带完全断裂的临床效果观察 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 41-44.

[2] 林韩, 刘圣星, 乔永军. Ilizarov技术配合撬拨复位与切开复位内固定术在治疗跟骨骨折上的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 449-453.
[3] 史风雷, 王琨, 吕夫新, 孙正考. 经皮内固定治疗复合创伤骨盆前环骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 428-431.
[4] 李谋林,周智,尹文军,万里飞,喻赣鹏,宋瑞清. 切开复位内固定联合旋髂深血管束髂骨瓣移植治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 361-365.
[5] 何家雄,吴征杰,曾焰辉,李灿辉. 线缆张力带内固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 288-291.
[6] 刘晓辉,张雷,谢获. 关节镜下空心螺钉治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 292-295.
[7] 曹建刚,张传开. 手法整复外固定术与切开复位内固定治疗B型踝关节骨折的早期临床效果比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 296-300.
[8] 杨志刚, 甘霖, 叶俊星 . 切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定与闭合复位外固定支架固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 206-210.
[9] 何勇,叶剑峰,简盛生. 不同固定方法对鹰嘴截骨术后肘关节功能的影响研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 121-124.
[10] 黄金河,赵玉驰,王力刚,许军. PFNA、APFLP及InterTan髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定性转子间骨折临床效果比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 136-140.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed