Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2018, Vol. 22 Issue (2): 113-118    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.02.008
  临床论著 |
腹腔镜疝修补术联合Nissen胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的前瞻性研究
丁海涛,韩智君,曹杰,迪米拉,帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木
新疆医科大学第六附属医院普外科,乌鲁木齐 830002
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Combined with Nissen Fundoplication for the Treatment of Esophageal HiatalHernia: A Prospective Study
DING Hai-tao, HAN Zhi-jun, CAO Jie, DI Mi-la, PAERHATI·Abudureyimu 
Department?of?General?Surgery,?Sixth?Affiliated?Hospital,?Xinjiang?Medical?University,?Urumqi?830002,?Xinjiang,?China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (242KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜疝修补术联合Nissen胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的效果。 方法 选择2016年1月至2017年9月本院收治的157例食管裂孔疝病人作为研究对象,根据随机、前瞻性、对照原则,将157例病人随机分到A组(n=75例)和B组(n=82例),两组病人均予以腹腔镜疝修补术,同时A组加以Nissen胃底折叠术治疗,B组加以Toupet胃底折叠术治疗,对比分析两组病人的手术情况、食管反流情况及食管压力。 结果 两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数、并发症情况及复发情况比较,结果均显示无统计学差异(P>0.05)。手术前,A组、B组患者的24 h内反流次数、反流时间、长反流次数、酸反流时间百分比、食管下括约肌压力、食管残余压、食管松弛率及无效吞咽情况比较,差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05);手术后6个月,A组、B组患者的24 h内反流次数、反流时间、长反流次数、酸反流时间百分比、食管下括约肌压力、食管残余压、食管松弛率及无效吞咽情况均明显优于手术前,且A组明显优于B组(均为P<0.05)。 结论 腹腔镜疝修补术联合Nissen胃底折叠术在抗反流效果、抑制术后吞咽困难发生、提高食管下括约肌压力方面的效果均明显优于Toupet胃底折叠术。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
丁海涛,韩智君,曹杰,迪米拉,帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木
关键词:  食管裂孔疝   腹腔镜检查   Nissen胃底折叠术   Toupet胃底折叠术   疝修补术    
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of laparoscopic hernia repair combined with Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of esophageal hiatus hernia. Methods A total of 157 patients with esophageal hiatal hernia treated in our hospital from January, 2016 to September, 2017 were selected as study subjects. According to the random, prospective, and collating principles, 157 patients were randomly assigned to group A (n=75) and group B (n=82). Laparoscopic hernia repair and gastric fundoplication were performed in both groups. Nissen fundoplication was administered in group A. While Toupet fundoplication was performed in Group B. The operation conditions, esophageal reflux status, and esophageal pressure were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and recurrence between the two groups (P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no difference in the frequency of 24-hour reflux, reflux time, frequency of long reflux, acid reflux time, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal residual pressure, esophageal relaxation rate, and ineffective swallowing within 24 hours between group A and B(P>0.05). 6 months after surgery, the results all were proved to be better than the pre-operative ones, such as the frequency of 24-hour reflux, reflux time,the frequency of long reflux, acid reflux time, and the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter in group A and B(P<0.05). Esophageal residual pressure, esophageal relaxation rate and ineffective swallowing were significantly better than the pre-operative ones(P<0.05), and group A was significantly better than group B (P<0.05).Conclusions Laparoscopic hernia repair combined with Nissen fundoplication is superior to Toupet fundoplication in preventing anti-reflux effect, inhibiting postoperative dysphagia, and increasing the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter.
Key words:  hiatal hernia     laparoscopy     Nissen funcloplication     Toupet funcloplication;hernia repair
               出版日期:  2018-04-26      发布日期:  2018-08-14      期的出版日期:  2018-04-26
ZTFLH:  R655.4  
通讯作者:  帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木,男,45岁,新疆医科大学第六附属医院普外科主任医师。   
作者简介:  丁海涛,男,37岁,新疆医科大学第六附属医院普外科主治医师。
引用本文:    
丁海涛,韩智君,曹杰,迪米拉,帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合Nissen胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(2): 113-118.
DING Hai-tao. Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Combined with Nissen Fundoplication for the Treatment of Esophageal HiatalHernia: A Prospective Study. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(2): 113-118.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2018.02.008  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2018/V22/I2/113
[1] 王杰, 罗浩, 王剑, 等. 腹腔镜下Nissen胃底折叠术联合食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效及预后[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(1):58-59,62.|[2] 张成, 克力木, 李义亮, 等. 氩离子凝固术联合腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并Barrett食管的疗效观察[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(11):1084-1087.|[3] 胡志伟, 汪忠镐, 吴继敏, 等. Stretta射频治疗和腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流相关性严重哮喘的比较研究[J]. 临床误诊误治,2013,26(7):57-61.|[4] 赵鹏, 张国志, 陈建立, 等. 腹腔镜微创手术治疗食管裂孔疝临床观察[J]. 河北医药,2014,34(8):1143-1145.|[5] 蔡逊, 张建新, 金炜东, 等. 胃食管反流病的外科手术治疗(附84例分析)[J].临床外科杂志,2014,(8):576-578.|[6] 刁海鑫, 吴文溪, 邓勇, 等. 腹腔镜引导下修补手术治疗食管裂孔疝疗效及对患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2015,21(10):1065-1068.|[7] 耿庆, 胡浩, 张本固, 等. 老年食管裂孔疝102例临床特点[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2014,32(24):5424-5425.|[8] 阿依都·阿不都热依木, 张辅江, 朱学鹏, 等. 四孔法行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2014,(4):323-324.|[9] 李亦军, 翟洪涛. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补胃底折叠术临床分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2015,7(11):120.|[10] 卡哈尔·吐尔逊, 买买提·吐尔逊, 克力木, 等. 经腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效观察:附21例报告[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2015,2(4):210-213.|[11] 李春雷, 邰沁文, 张金辉, 等. 胃食管反流病的腹腔镜外科治疗[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2012,21(2):192-195.|[12] 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 沙拉依丁·沙力克江, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 等. 聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术的临床应用[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志,2016,3(4):170-172.|[13] 张成, 克力木, 牛伟亚, 等. 腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式治疗的食管裂孔疝临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2015,4(1):53-56.|[14] 克力木, 张成, 牛伟亚, 等. 食管裂孔疝的腹腔镜治疗[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2014,12(3):206-208.|[15] 胡志伟, 汪忠镐, 吴继敏, 等. 胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝及哮喘症状的腹腔镜外科治疗[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2014,(5):396-402.
[1] 朱建平1,牟东成1,薛晨辉2,余国华3,杨广伟1,李永猛1,马双飞1,张奇峰1,赵勇1,赵磊1,王海涛1,孙伟光1,谭建平1. 急性胆囊炎胆囊颈管结石嵌顿的腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 10-13.
[2] 唐志强,单远洲. 经腋窝入路单孔腔镜甲状腺手术临床疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 18-21.
[3] 吴伟1,张光银1,宏军2. 腹腔镜下CME对右半结肠癌患者的临床治疗效果[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 410-412.
[4] 王晓丽1,赵卫东2,陈峥峥1,王群华1,李敏1. 腹腔镜下子宫腺肌病病灶切除术后联合应用GnRH-a的临床价值分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 454-457.
[5] 付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,胡楠,田晓军. 不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 99-104.
[6] 孙颢1,高友福1,陈佳栋1,米娜瓦尔·亚合普2. 生物蛋白胶固定补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 111-112.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed