Comparison of the Effects of One-stage Combination of the Anterior and Posterior Approaches with SimpleAnterior Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis
Abstract: Objective?To compare the clinical effects of the one-stage combined anterior and posterior approach with the simple anterior approach in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.Methods?Retrospective analysis wasdone in 92 patients with lumbar tuberculosis who underwent bone grafting and internal fixation from September,2008 to September,2013.Among them,there were 46 cases of group A received the combined anterior and posterior approach with internal fixation.And there were 46 cases of group B underwent a simple anterior fixation.All patients were routinely treated with standard anti-TBdrugs for 3 weeks before operation.Results?In group A,the value of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperativehospital stay,the usedays of antibiotic,operation areadrainage volume,the incidence of complications,and fusion time was (315.5±30.4)ml,(607.0±104.3)ml,(14.0±1.7)d,(7.3±1.3)d,(230.5±23.4)ml,6.52% and (6.1±1.3) months respectively,which washigher than that of group B [(240.7±35.7)min,(319.3±88.2)ml,(10.0±2.1)d,(4.6±2.1)d,(168.7±25.1)ml,2.17% and (5.8±2.3) months] except for the complication rate and fusion time (P<0.001).The rate of kyphotic correction was 71.0%±4.3% in group A,which washigher than 52.0%±3.6% of group B (P<0.001).The Cobb angle of group A were less than group B at the last follow-up (P<0.001).After 3.5 years follow-up,the cure rate of group A was 93.7%,which was notdifferent of 88.6% of group B (P>0.05).Conclusion?Itdemonstrates that the one-stage combined anterior and posterior approach provides better local clearace,higher correction rate of malformation and better spinal stability.
周建华1，张昊1，陈少初1，张弦1，胡亚威1，菅新民1，卢学有1，罗卓荆2，黄景辉2. 一期前后路联合与单纯前路内固定手术治疗腰椎结核的效果对比[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 33-36.
ZHOU Jian-hua. Comparison of the Effects of One-stage Combination of the Anterior and Posterior Approaches with SimpleAnterior Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2018, 22(1): 33-36.
[1] 陈雁华,李娟,陈子贤,等.脊柱结核术后并发症的危险因素分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2016,36(17):1126-1132.|[2] 张宏,其郭强,郭超峰,等.单纯后路、单纯前路或前后联合入路治疗成人腰椎结核的中期疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志，2016,36(11)：651-652.|[3] 马远征，薛海滨.脊柱结核的外科治疗策略[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(11):805-807.|[4] 霍洪军,邢文华,杨学军,等.脊柱结核手术治疗方式的选择[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(10):819-821.|[5] Rajasekaran S,Kanna RM,Shetty AP.History of spine surgery for tuberculous spondylodiscitis[J].Unfallchirurg,2015,118 Suppl 1: 19-27.|[6] Shi JD,Wang Q,Wang ZL.Primary issues in the selection of surgical procedures for thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis[J].Orthop Surg,2014,6(4): 259-268.|[7] 胡斌,钱选昆,王文己.一期单纯后路和前后联合入路病灶清除植骨内固定术治疗脊柱结核的临床疗效对比[J].脊柱外科杂志,2016,14(5):267-271.|[8] Yang P,Zang Q,Kang J,et,al.Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis[J].Eur Spine J,2016,25(12)：3864-3874.|[9] 马敏杰,王文涛,蒋勇,等.一期病灶清除植骨融合前后路联合内固定治疗复发性胸腰椎结核[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(7):684-687.|[10] Ma YZ,Cui X,Li HW,et al.Outcomes of anterior and posterior instrumentation underdifferent surgical procedures for reating thoratic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(2): 299-305.|[11] 廖烨晖,康敏,唐强,等.手术治疗腰骶椎结核的术式选择[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(2):104-109.|[12] 应小樟,郑琦,石仕元,等.前路小切口病灶清除联合后路内固定治疗腰椎结核[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(6):517-521.|[13] 金大地.脊柱结核手术入路的合理选择[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(9):771-772.|[14] Gerber M,Crawford NR,Chamberlain RH,et al.Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw?plate: comparison to stand?alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstablehuman cadaver model[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(7):762-768.|[15] 张泽华,陈非凡,李建华.不同类型腰骶椎结核手术治疗方式的有效性和安全性研究[J].中华骨科杂志，2016,36(11):662-665.
2018, Vol. 22 
