Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach and posterlateral approach in short term.MethodsFrom February 2014 to December 2016, a total of 80 femoral neck fracture patients in our department were randomly divided into observation group and control group according to random digits table, with 40 patients of each group. The observation group was performed THA by direct anterior approach, and the control group was carried out THA by posterlateral approach. The effects of short term were compared between two groups.ResultsThere were no statistical difference in the operation time between the two groups (P>0.05), but the length of incision, the amount of blood loss and the amount of blood transfusion in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically (P<0.05). According to Harris score, the postoperative outcome was revealed 30 cases of excellence, 8 cases of good and 2 cases of fair in the observation group, and 20 cases of excellence, 10 cases of good, 6 cases of fair and 4 cases of false in the control group, and there was statistical difference in the fineness rate between two groups 3 months after the surgery (95% vs. 75%,P<0.05). The postoperative complication was found in 3 cases of the observation group, including one of calcar femorale fracture, dislocation and greater trochanter bursitis for each, and was in 10 cases of the control group, including 4 of calcar femorale fracture, 3 of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, 2 of dislocation and 1 of trochanteric bursitis. The complication rate of the observation group was 7.5%, and was lower than 25% of the control group, and the difference was statistically between two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionCompares with the posterolateral approach, the THA via direct anterior approach can reduce the surgical trauma, promote the recovery of hip function, decrease the complications and improve the efficacy of short term.
米博文，张立新，刘义辉. 前方直接入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术近期疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 440-444.
MI Bo-wen. Effect Comparison on Total Hip Arthroplasty by Direct Anterior Approach and Posterolateral Approach in Short Term. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(6): 440-444.
[1] Okumura K, Yamaguchi K, Tamaki T, et al. Prospective analyses of female urinary incontinence symptoms following total hip arthroplasty[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017, 28(4):561-568. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3138-x.[2] Agten CA, Sutter R, Dora C, et al. MR imaging of soft tissue alterations after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of classic surgical approaches[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(3):1312-1321. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4455-7.[3] Meneghini RM, Elston AS, Chen AF, et al. Direct anterior approach: Risk factor for early femoral failure of cementless total hip arthroplasty: A multicenter study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2017, 99(2):99-105. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00060.[4] Crist BD, Ivie CB, Bal BS. Total hip replacement with use of a direct anterior approach: A critical analysis review[J]. JBJS, 2014, 2(6). pii: 01874474-201402060-00002. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00086. No abstract available.[5] Watts CD, Houdek MT, Wyles CC, et al. Direct anterior versus posterior simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties: No major differences at 90 Days[J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2016, 45(6):E373-E378.[6] Ghijselings SG, Driesen R, Simon JP, et al. Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip: A cadaveric feasibility study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1):300-303. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.003.[7] Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA, et al. Adoption of robotic vs fluoroscopic guidance in total hip arthroplasty: Is acetabular positioning improved in the learning curve?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039.[8] Amanatullah DF, Masini MA, Roger DJ, et al. Greater inadvertent muscle damage in direct anterior approach when compared with the direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(8):1036-1042. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37178.[9] 史成富, 牛德刚, 邹方亮. 直接前入路与后入路初次全髋关节置换术的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,4(12):345-348.[10] Cadossi M, Sambri A, Tedesco G, et al. Anterior approach in total hip replacement[J]. Orthopedics, 2017, 40(3):e553-e556. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161202-06.[11] Sibia US, Turner TR, MacDonald JH, et al. The impact of surgical technique on patient reported outcome measures and early complications after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(4):1171-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.031.[12] 刘新光, 王卫国, 张念非, 等. 直接前入路与后方入路对全髋关节置换术疗效及安全性影响的系统评价及meta分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2016,2(9):128-134.[13] Molenaers B, Driesen R, Molenaers G, et al. The direct anterior approach for complex primary total hip arthroplasty: The extensile acetabular approach on a regular operating room table[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(5):1553-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.016.[14] Boettner F, Zingg M, Emara AK, et al. The accuracy of acetabular component position using a novel method to determine anteversion[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(4):1180-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.004.[15] 俞银贤, 易诚青, 马金忠, 等. 微创直接前入路与传统后外侧入路全髋关节置换治疗股骨头坏死的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国骨伤,2016,8(9):702-707.[16] Nakamura N, Maeda Y, Hamawaki M, et al. Effect of soft-tissue impingement on range of motion during posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an in vivo measurement study[J]. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon), 2016, 21(1):132-136.[17] Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Bolliger L, et al. Risk of infection in primary, elective total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach or lateral transgluteal approach: a prospective cohort study of 1104 hips[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17(1):471.[18] 戚大春, 安新荣. 高龄患者股骨颈骨折微创关节置换与标准后入路置换术的疗效对比[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2016,26(17):81-85.[19] Meermans G, Konan S, Das R, et al. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99-B(6):732-740. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.38053.[20] Kochman A, Goral A, Martin T, et al. Application of navigated ultrasound for assessment of the anterior pelvic plane in patients with degenerative hip diseases[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(7):1373-1380. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.07016.[21] Jelsma J, Pijnenburg R, Boons HW, et al. Limited benefits of the direct anterior approach in primary hip arthroplasty: A prospective single centre cohort study[J]. J Orthop, 2016, 14(1):53-58.[22] Mori C, Hageman D, Zimmerly K. Nursing care of the patient undergoing an anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty[J]. Orthop Nurs, 2017, 36(2):124-130. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000326.[23] Ziebarth K, Milosevic M, Lerch TD, et al. High survivorship and little osteoarthritis at 10-year followup in SCFE patients treated with a modified dunn procedure[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(4):1212-1228. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5252-6.[24] Fransen B, Hoozemans M, Vos S. Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hiparthroplasty?: one surgeon, two approaches[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2016, 82(2):240-248.
2017, Vol. 21 
