Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (2): 99-104    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.005
  临床论著 |
不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用
付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,胡楠,田晓军
四川省自贡市第四人民医院普外一科,自贡643000
The Effect Analysis on the Different Drainage Tubes with Side Holes Combined with Drainage Auxiliary Device for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
FU Zhao-jun,YANG Yu-hui,WEI Jian,HU Nan,Tian Xiao-jun
Department of General Surgery,Zigong Fourth People's Hospital,Zigong 643000,Sichuan,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (494KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除手术中使用不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置的引流效果。方法选取180例行腹腔镜阑尾切除手术患者,均安置一根盆腔引流管,随机分为A组、B组和C组各60例。A组术中使用具有2个侧孔引流管,B组使用6个侧孔引流管,C组使用12个侧孔引流管,均结合引流辅助装置使用。术后相应时间对进行引流管调整,比较三组每次引流管调整操作时间,疼痛评分,引流管堵塞,引流管脱落,拔出困难,引流管断裂,置管时间,残余感染,肠梗阻,电解质紊乱,二次手术等指标。结果三组患者行引流管调整时疼痛数字评分、引流管操作调整时间、次数、难易度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后均未发生引流管断裂及需二次手术者。三组间术后发生引流管脱落,拔管困难,炎性肠梗阻,电解质紊乱并发症比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05),但盆腔积液量、置管时间及引流管堵塞率、感染率比较,C组显著优于A组及B组(P<0.05)。结论应用引流辅助装置在术后进行引流管调整操作简单、方便,保证了引流管的通畅;结合多孔引流管在腹部外科手术中有很高的应用价值,其引流效果更好,且引流管相关并发症的发生率低。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,胡楠,田晓军
关键词:  引流管  引流辅助装置  阑尾切除术  腹腔镜检查  阑尾炎  手术后并发症    
Abstract: Objective To explore the drainage effect of the different drainage tube with side holes combined with drainage auxiliary device during the laparoscopic appendectomy.MethodsA randomized controlled clinical research was used to investigate the drainage effect in 180 cases placed a pelvic drainage tube during the laparoscopic appendectomy surgery.They were randomly divided into group A,B and C with 60 cases for each group,and were placed drainage tube with two side holes,six side holes and 12 side holes respectively.The drainage auxiliary device was applied in all groups.The operating time and pain scores of the drainage tube adjustment,post-operative complication such as blockage,falling off,difficulties of extraction,breakage,cathetering time of the drainage tube,residual infection rate,intestinal obstruction,electrolyte disturbances and reoperation rate were compared among three groups.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the pain score,operating duration,times and difficulties of drainage tube adjustment among three groups(P >0.05).No drainage tube breakage and reoperation occurred in all cases.No statistical differences were found in post-operative complication as pulling-out,difficulty in decannulation,intestinal obstruction and electrolyte disturbances(P >0.05)among three groups,but there was statistical difference in pelvic hydrops volume,indwelling catheter time,drainage tube blockage rate and infection rate,the group C was better than group A and B(P<0.05).ConclusionsThe application of drainage auxiliary device can adjust the drainage tube conveniently and ensure the drainage tube unobstructed.Combined with multi-side holes,it appears supernal value in the abdominal surgery with ideal drainage effect and lower post-operative complication rate of associated drainage tube.
Key words:  drainage tube    draingae auxiliary device    appendectomy    laparoscopy    appendicitis    postoperative complications
收稿日期:  2016-12-27      修回日期:  2017-04-19                发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-04-26
ZTFLH:  R656.8  
基金资助: 四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(编号:17PJ121)
通讯作者:  杨玉辉   
作者简介:  付召军,男,33岁,四川省自贡市第四人民医院普外一科主治医师。
引用本文:    
付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,胡楠,田晓军. 不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 99-104.
FU Zhao-jun. The Effect Analysis on the Different Drainage Tubes with Side Holes Combined with Drainage Auxiliary Device for Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(2): 99-104.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.005  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I2/99
[1]Ballard DH,Alexander JS,Weisman JA,et al.Number and location of drainage catheter side holes:in vitro evaluation[J].Clin Radiol,2015,70(9):974-980.Doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.05.004.[2]Fagenholz PJ,Peev MP,Thabet A,et al.Abscess due to perforated appendicitis:factors associated with successfulpercutaneous drainage[J].Am J Surg,2016,212(4):794-798.doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.017.[3]廖永慧,高敏,冯碧,等.引流管固定器在"T"管固定中的效果分析[J].华西医学,2013,28(4):596-598.[4]Di Saverio S,Mandrioli M,Sibilio A,et al.A cost-effective technique for laparoscopic appendectomy:outcomes andcosts of a case-control prospective single-operator study of 112 unselectedconsecutive cases of complicated acute appendicitis[J].J Am Coll Surg,2014,218(3):e51-65.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.003.[5]朱科第,唐小丽,肖硕萌,等.引流管固定装置Elock应用于腹腔引流管固定的效果观察[J].四川医学,2015,36(8):1132-1134.[6]Akkoyun I,Tuna AT.Advantages of abandoning abdominal cavity irrigation and drainage inoperations performed on children with perforated appendicitis[J].J Pediatr Surg,2012,47(10):1886-1890.edsurg.2012.03.049.[7]Nazarey PP,Stylianos S,Velis E,et al.Treatment of suspected acute perforated appendicitis with antibiotics andinterval appendectomy[J].J Pediatr Surg,2014,49(3):447-450.doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.10.001.[8]代佑果.自制双侧孔腹腔引流管用于癌性腹水引流的研究[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2008,12(3):201-203.[9]何贤禄,刘伟.腹腔引流管拔除困难的原因分析及处理方法(附22例报道)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(4):490-492.[10]黄天晴,刘慧姝,戴满花,等.腹腔引流管诊断围产期子宫切除术后腹腔内出血的临床价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(11):3323-3324.[11]Liu JM,Chen WZ,Fu BQ,et al.The Use of Closed Suction Drainage in Lumbar Spinal Surgery:Is It ReallyNecessary? [J].World Neurosurg,2016,90:109-115.doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.091.[12]陈积圣,霍景山.腹部手术后引流管的管理策略[J].临床外科杂志,2016,14(9):550-551.[13]龙崑,邹爱美.急性重症胰腺炎22例术后胰周引流管的管理体会[J].中国误诊学杂志,2010,10(11):2731-2732.[14]Messager M,Sabbagh C,Denost Q,et al.Is there still a need for prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage in elective majorgastro-intestinal surgery? [J].J Visc Surg,2015,152(5):305-313.doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.008.[15]Robert B,Chivot C,Rebibo L,et al.Percutaneous transglutl drainage of pelvic abscesses in interventionalradiology:A safe alternative to surgery[J].J Visc Surg,2016,153(1):3-7.doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.10.006.[16]王有财,韩广森,王刚成,等.腹腔引流管周围敷料浸润的原因分析及处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2013,22(S1):19-23.[17]Miller DL,Helms GA,Mayfield WR.Digital Drainage System Reduces Hospitalization After Video-AssistedThoracoscopic Surgery Lung Resection[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2016,102(3):955-961.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.089.[18]王飞,权永志,刘军杰,等.多侧孔硅胶引流管负压切口皮下引流在预防急性化脓性阑尾炎术后切口感染中的应用价值[J].临床合理用药,2016,9(4):97-99.[19]丁彩儿.引流管两种不同固定方法的效果比较[J].中华护理杂志,2008,43(5):413-414.[20]邓治洲,郭仪,卢衡凭,等.乳腺癌改良根治术不同引流管侧孔修剪方式引流效果分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(4):445-446.
[1] 朱建平, 牟东成, 薛晨辉, 余国华, 杨广伟, 李永猛, 马双飞, 张奇峰, 赵勇, 赵磊, 王海涛, 孙伟光, 谭建平.

急性胆囊炎胆囊颈管结石嵌顿的腹腔镜胆囊切除术 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 10-13.

[2] 唐志强, 单远洲.

经腋窝入路单孔腔镜甲状腺手术临床疗效分析 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 18-21.

[3] 李鹏, 周伟, 袁永群.

舒芬太尼用于腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术后靶控输注镇痛的临床效果 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 77-80.

[4] 王正林. 腹腔镜辅助及开腹手术在结直肠癌中的近期临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 401-405.
[5] 韩爱民, 祝丽丽, 朱家明, 刘绪轩, 徐清, 孙佩全. 腹腔镜经腹前大肠部分切除加直肠悬吊固定治疗成人直肠全脱垂[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 406-409.
[6] 王晓丽, 赵卫东, 陈峥峥, 王群华, 李敏. 腹腔镜下子宫腺肌病病灶切除术后联合应用GnRHa的临床价值分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 454-457.
[7] 李翠芬, 刘燕燕, 霍炽文. 腹腔镜与宫腔镜治疗子宫疤痕妊娠临床疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 458-463.
[8] 吴伟, 张光银, 宏军.

腹腔镜下CME对右半结肠癌患者的临床治疗效果 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 410-412.

[9] 丁海涛, 韩智君, 曹杰, 迪米拉, 帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木. 胃十二指肠三角吻合术在远端胃癌根治术后消化道重建中的安全性及疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 182-186.
[10] 江晓华,郑子晗,周鹏,周秩武,万宇飞,张天顺,张伟. 腹腔镜与开腹低位直肠癌保肛手术临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 81-84.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed