Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (5): 344-349    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.006
  临床论著 |
自固定补片不同铺置方法在腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术中的应用
杜一鸿1, 刘云莉2, 刘明杰1
1.西安长安医院普外科,陕西西安 710016;2.扶风县中医院预防保健科,陕西扶风 722200
The Comparison on the Selfgripping Patch with Different Pavement Methods in Bilateral Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy for Inguinal Hernia
DU Yi-hong1, LIU Yun-li2, LIU Ming-jie1
1.Department of General Surgery, Chang'an Hospital, Xi'an 710016, Shaanxi, China; 2.Department of Prevention and Healthcare, Traditional Chinese Hospital of Fufeng, Fufeng 722200, Shaanxi, China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (245KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨不同修补材料和铺置方法对腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术疗效的影响。 方法选取2013年9月~2016年1月期间我院确诊并行腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术患者180例,依据术中固定补片类型分为:聚丙烯组60例,采用常规聚丙烯补片修补;自固定组120例,予自固定补片修补,根据据铺置方法又分为改良组(n=60例)和常规组(n=60例),分别采用改良和常规方法铺置补片。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,自制《腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术患者满意度问卷》评估患者满意度。随访12个月,记录并比较所有患者手术指标(铺片、手术、住院时间、术中出血量、住院费用)、术后并发症、疼痛及满意度。结果改良组和常规组患者铺片时间、手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、住院费用以及术后1、7、15 d VAS评分均明显低于聚丙烯组,术后6个月和12个月患者满意率明显高于聚丙烯组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良组患者铺片时间、手术时间、术中出血量明显低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而两组患者住院时间、费用、术后各期VAS评分、术后并发症率和患者满意率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组患者均无复发。结论腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术中应用自固定补片可有效缩短中操作时间,减小创伤,减轻术后疼痛,促进患者恢复,降低治疗费用,有利于提高患者满意度,且并不增加并发症和复发风险;术中通过改良补片铺置方法可进一步使补片展开更加快捷并减少患者术中创伤,值得临床推广。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
DU Yi-hong1
LIU Yun-li2
LIU Ming-jie1
关键词:  腹腔镜检查  疝,腹股沟  疝修补术  补片    
Abstract: ObjectiveTo discuss the effect of different patches and pavement methods in bilateral laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia.MethodsThe clinical data of 180 cases with inguinal hernia performed bilateral laparoscopic herniorrhaphy inguinal from September 2013 to January 2016 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to fixed patch type, all cases were dived into two groups: The polypropylene group (n=60) was repaired by conventional polypropylene patch, and the selffixed group (n=120) was repaired by selfgripping patch. According to the pavement methods, the latter was divided into the improved group and the conventional group with 60 cases for each, and was carried out improved and regular pavement method during the surgery respectively. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of pain, and the satisfaction questionnaire of bilateral laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy was used to assess the satisfaction of the patients. All cases were followed up for 12 months. The operative indexes as pavement time, operation time, hospital stays, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost and postoperative complication rate, VAS score and satisfaction rate were recorded and compared.ResultsThe pavement, surgery, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost, and VAS score of 1, 7, 15 d after the surgery were significantly lower, and the satisfaction rate was obviously higher in the selffixed group (including both improved group and conventional group) than those in the polypropylene group, and all the differences were statistically (P<0.05). The pavement time, operative time and intraoperative blood loss of the improved group was remarkable lower in those of the conventional group (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in hospital stays, cost, VAS score of different time point after the surgery, postoperative complication rate and satisfaction rate between two groups (P>0.05). No recurrence was found in all cases.ConclusionsThe application of selffixed patch can effectively shorten the operating time, decrease the trauma and postoperative pain, and then promote the patient's recovery, reduce the treatment costs, increase the patient's satisfaction rate for bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without increasing the risk of complication and recurrence. During the surgery, the improved patch pavement method can unfold the patch quickly and expediently, and is worthy of popularization.
Key words:  laparoscopy    hernia, inguinal    herniorrhaphy    patch
               出版日期:  2017-10-26      发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-10-26
ZTFLH:  R656.21  
作者简介:  杜一鸿,男,40岁,西安长安医院普外科主治医师。
引用本文:    
杜一鸿1, 刘云莉2, 刘明杰1. 自固定补片不同铺置方法在腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 344-349.
DU Yi-hong1, LIU Yun-li2, LIU Ming-jie1. The Comparison on the Selfgripping Patch with Different Pavement Methods in Bilateral Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy for Inguinal Hernia. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(5): 344-349.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009-2188.2017.05.006  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I5/344
[1] Amato G, Agrusa A, Romano G, et al. Modified fixation free plug technique using a new 3D multilamellar implant for inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study of a single operator case series[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2):243250. doi: 10.1007/s100290131102y.
[2] Canonico S, Benevento R, Perna G, et al. Sutureless fixation with fibrin glue of lightweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: effect on postoperative pain: a doubleblind, randomized trial versus standard heavyweight mesh[J]. Surgery, 2013, 153(1):126130. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.024.
[3] 阿吉木?阿不力克木, 仝传志, 肖滨曾, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中3D补片免固定技术与平片补片的比较研究[J]. 中国综合临床,2016,32(4):356358.
[4] 中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(3):I0004I0006.
[5] Yilmaz A, Yener O, Kaynak B, et al. Selfgripping CovidienTM ProGripTM mesh versus polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: multicenter short term results[J]. Prague Med Rep, 2013, 114(4): 231238.
[6] 方轲. 内镜下自固定轻量补片修补术治疗腹膜前腹股沟疝临床效果分析[J]. 中国处方药,2016,14(3):125125,126.
[7] Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(3):639649. doi: 10.1007/s0046401119317.
[8] 陈佳栋, 孙颢, 高友福, 等. 腹股沟疝治疗中改良Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的选择[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志,2017,21(3):191193.
[9] Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection after tensionfree hernia repair: a Bayesian and frequentist metaanalysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217(5):788801.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.386.
[10] Izard G, Kehlet H, Wijsmuller AR, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of postoperative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3):239249. doi: 10.1007/s1002901107989.
[11] 李海鹏, 庞春宏. 自固定补片与普通平片在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的对比研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志,2016,18(2):7577.
[12] Kukleta JF, Freytag C, Weber M. Efficiency and safety of mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using nbutyl cyanoacrylate: longterm biocompatibility in over 1,300 mesh fixations[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(2):153162. doi: 10.1007/s1002901108879.
[13] 孙颢, 高友福, 陈佳栋, 等. 生物蛋白胶固定补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志,2017,21(2):111112.
[14] Kingsnorth A, GingellLittlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of selfgripping ParietexTM ProGripTM polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3):287294. doi: 10.1007/s100290120900y.
[15] 陆景锋, 丁军彬, 肖立俊, 等. 不同固定方式在Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术应用的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(6):2528.
[16] 王荫龙, 张新, 满艺, 等. 不同类型网片应用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术疗效的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(10):818822.
[17] 管建松, 戎祯祥, 汤捷, 等. 自固定补片在完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用前景及放置技巧[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(4):14.
[18] Birk D, Hess S, GarciaPardo C. Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGripTM mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean followup at 23 months[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(3):313320. doi: 10.1007/s1002901310533.
[19] 吴章, 吴玉泉, 刘伟. 局部麻醉下网塞充填式与平片式无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(5):4345.
[20] Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, et al. Permanent endsigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection[J]. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Sep;55(9):963969. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825fb5ff.
[1] 朱建平, 牟东成, 薛晨辉, 余国华, 杨广伟, 李永猛, 马双飞, 张奇峰, 赵勇, 赵磊, 王海涛, 孙伟光, 谭建平.

急性胆囊炎胆囊颈管结石嵌顿的腹腔镜胆囊切除术 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 10-13.

[2] 唐志强, 单远洲.

经腋窝入路单孔腔镜甲状腺手术临床疗效分析 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 18-21.

[3] 李鹏, 周伟, 袁永群.

舒芬太尼用于腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术后靶控输注镇痛的临床效果 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 77-80.

[4] 王晓丽, 赵卫东, 陈峥峥, 王群华, 李敏. 腹腔镜下子宫腺肌病病灶切除术后联合应用GnRHa的临床价值分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 454-457.
[5] 李翠芬, 刘燕燕, 霍炽文. 腹腔镜与宫腔镜治疗子宫疤痕妊娠临床疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 458-463.
[6] 王正林. 腹腔镜辅助及开腹手术在结直肠癌中的近期临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 401-405.
[7] 韩爱民, 祝丽丽, 朱家明, 刘绪轩, 徐清, 孙佩全. 腹腔镜经腹前大肠部分切除加直肠悬吊固定治疗成人直肠全脱垂[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 406-409.
[8] 吴伟, 张光银, 宏军.

腹腔镜下CME对右半结肠癌患者的临床治疗效果 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 410-412.

[9] 焦兰农,周绍荣. 急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机选择[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 340-343.
[10] 周松,聂凯,陈达丰,张文华,薛小军,陈锦荣,陈宇凡. 腹腔镜下直肠远断端再裸化预防吻合口出血[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 333-336.
[11] 朱斌,潘卫兵,张遂兵,曹石金. TUPKRP联合无张力疝修补术同期治疗BPH合并腹股沟疝[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(5): 391-394.
[12] 丁海涛, 韩智君, 曹杰, 迪米拉, 帕尔哈提·阿布都热衣木. 胃十二指肠三角吻合术在远端胃癌根治术后消化道重建中的安全性及疗效观察[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 182-186.
[13] 陈佳栋, 孙颢, 高友福, 米娜瓦尔·亚合普. 腹股沟疝治疗中改良Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的选择[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 191-193.
[14] 付召军,杨玉辉,魏健,胡楠,田晓军. 不同侧孔引流管结合引流辅助装置在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 99-104.
[15] 孙颢1,高友福1,陈佳栋1,米娜瓦尔·亚合普2. 生物蛋白胶固定补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 111-112.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed