Please wait a minute...

中国现代手术学杂志  2017, Vol. 21 Issue (2): 136-140    DOI: 10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.014
  临床论著 |
PFNA、APFLP及InterTan髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定性转子间骨折临床效果比较
黄金河,赵玉驰,王力刚,许军
深圳市第七人民医院骨科,深圳518081
Effect Comparison on Internal Fixation of PFNA,InterTan and APFLP for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Aged Patients
HUANG Jin-he,ZHAO Yu-chi,WANG Li-gang,XU Jun
Department of Orthopedics,Shenzhen Seventh People's Hospital,Shenzhen 518081,Guangdong,China
下载:  RICH HTML  PDF (218KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)、股骨近端解剖锁定钢板(APFLP)及联合拉力交锁髓内钉(InterTan)治疗高龄不稳定性转子间骨折的临床效果。方法2009年4月~2015年4月我院收治高龄不稳定性转子间骨折患者90例,根据内固定方式的不同分为三组,各30例,分别采用PFNA、InterTan及APFLP内固定。比较三组患者术中出血量、手术时间、切口长度、术中透视次数、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、髋关节功能优良率、髋关节功能评分(Harris评分)及术后并发症情况。结果两组患者均获得1年以上随访。PFNA组患者术中出血量最小、手术时间最短,InterTan组次之,APFLP组术中出血最多、手术时间最长(P<0.05);PFNA组与Inter Tan组切口长度、术中透视次数均小(/少)于APFLP组(P<0.05)。三组患者住院时间、骨折愈合时间、髋关节功能优良率、Harris评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);而APFLP组总并发症率明显高于其他两组(P<0.05),而PFNA组和InterTan组并发症率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论PFNA、APFLP及InterTan 髓内钉内固定均适用于高龄不稳定性转子间骨折,但PFNA具有手术操作简单、术中创伤较小、术后并发症较少等优点,成为不稳定性转子间骨折治疗的首选。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄金河,赵玉驰,王力刚,许军
关键词:  髓内钉  钢板  骨折固定术,内  髋骨折  不稳定骨折    
Abstract: Objective To explore and compare the curative effect on the internal fixation of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA),InterTan and anatomic proximal femoral locking plate(APFLP)in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in aged.MethodsA total of 90 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture collected from April 2009 to April 2014 in our hospital were divided into three groups(n=30)according to internal fixation,and performed PFNA fixation(the PFNA group),InterTan fixation(the InterTan group)and APFLP fixation(the APFLP group)respectively.The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,length of incision,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,the length of hospital stays,time of fracture healing,hip function outcome(Harris score),fine rate and postoperative complications were recorded and compared among three groups.ResultsAll cases of three groups were followed up more than one year.Among three groups,the PFNA group had least blood loss and shortest operative time,InterTan group followed,and APFLP group had most blood loss and longest operative time(P <0.05).The length of incision and intraoperative fluoroscopy times of both PFNA group and InterTan group were less than those of APFLP group(P <0.05).There was no statistical difference in the length of hospital stays,fracture healing time,Harris score and fine rate ofhip function among three groups(P >0.05).The postoperative complication rate of APFLP group were higher than the other two groups(P <0.05),but there was no statistical difference between PFNA group and InterTan group(P>0.05).ConclusionsAll the internal fixation of PFNA,APFLP and InterTan were suitable for the unstable intertrochanteric fractures in aged.But PFNA was the first choice in consideration of the simple operation procedure,minimally intraoperative trauma and less postoperative complications.
Key words:  intramedullary nail    plate    fracture fixation,internal    hip fractures    unstable fractures
收稿日期:  2016-06-13      修回日期:  2017-04-10                发布日期:  2018-05-25      期的出版日期:  2017-04-26
ZTFLH:  R683.42  
通讯作者:  黄金河   
作者简介:  黄金河,男,41岁,深圳市第七人民医院骨科副主任医师。
引用本文:    
黄金河,赵玉驰,王力刚,许军. PFNA、APFLP及InterTan髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定性转子间骨折临床效果比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(2): 136-140.
HUANG Jin-he,ZHAO Yu-chi,WANG Li-gang,XU Jun. Effect Comparison on Internal Fixation of PFNA,InterTan and APFLP for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Aged Patients. Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery, 2017, 21(2): 136-140.
链接本文:  
http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/10.16260/j.cnki.1009 -2188.2017.02.014  或          http://www.surgerychina.com/CN/Y2017/V21/I2/136
[1]Turgut A,Kalenderer,Günaydm B,et al.Fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures using Proximal Femoral NailAntirotation(PFNA)in the lateral decubitus position without a traction table[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2014,48(5):513-520.doi:10.3944/AOTT.2014.14.0098.[2]Lee SY,Niikura T,Iwakura T,et al.Complete traumatic backout of the blade of proximal femoral nail antirotation:a case report[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2014,100(4):441-443.doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.028.[3]杨进顺,吕浩然,黄文铎,等.骨质疏松患者转子间骨折不同治疗方法的比较[J].中华创伤杂志,2008,24(11):884-887.[4]Flores LA,Harrington IJ,Heller M.The stability of intertrochanteric fractures treated with a sliding screw-plate[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1990,72(1):37-40.[5]Jin L,Zhang L,Hou Z,et al.Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures:an operative technicaltip[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(7):1317-1320.doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1430-3.[6]Jiang Y,Li J,Dib HH,et al.Implantation of INTERTANTMnail in four patients with intertrochantericfractures leading to single or comminute fractures:pitfalls and recommendations:a case series[J].J Med Case Rep,2014,8:383.doi:10.1186/1752-1947-8-383.[7]Russell TA,Sanders R.Pertrochanteric hip fractures:time for change[J].J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(4):189-190.doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f221c1.[8]Nüchtern JV,Ruecker AH,Sellenschloh K,et al.Malpositioning of the lag screws by 1-or 2-screw nailing systems forpertrochanteric femoral fractures:a biomechanical comparison of gamma 3 andintertan[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(5):276-282.doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000008.[9]袁晓明,姚琦,倪杰,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(11):836-839.[10]Zhong B,Zhang Y,Zhang C,et al.A comparison of proximal femoral locking compression plates with dynamic hipscrews in extracapsular femoral fractures[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2014,100(6):663-668.doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.012.[11]童松林,高益斌,陆文杰,等.微创动力髋螺钉与动力髋螺钉治疗高龄粉碎性股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(3):231-233.[12]Connelly CL,Archdeacon MT.The lateral decubitus approach for complex proximal femur fractures:anatcreduction and locking plate neutralization:a technical trick[J].J Orthop Trauma,2012,26(4):252-257.doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e0b2d.[13]Sahin EK,Imerci A,Klnlk H,et al.Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)with AO dynamiccondylar screws(DCS)for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoralfractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(3):347-352.doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1195-0.[14]王东,王起奎,周君琳.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与InterTan髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(8):668-673.
[1] 孙冶智, 余磊, 王伟, 梁宏伟.

不同方式治疗踝关节骨折伴三角韧带完全断裂的临床效果观察 [J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2018, 22(1): 41-44.

[2] 史风雷, 王琨, 吕夫新, 孙正考. 经皮内固定治疗复合创伤骨盆前环骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 428-431.
[3] 关雪, 吴隆延. 开放与闭合复位髓内钉内固定对股骨干骨折的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(6): 436-439.
[4] 何家雄,吴征杰,曾焰辉,李灿辉. 线缆张力带内固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 288-291.
[5] 曹建刚,张传开. 手法整复外固定术与切开复位内固定治疗B型踝关节骨折的早期临床效果比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(4): 296-300.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed